首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

改良单图像法手工测量髌骨不稳患者胫骨结节-股骨滑车沟间距的可行性分析
引用本文:张合,曹成明,兰志恒,赵志光,刘巍,韩守江.改良单图像法手工测量髌骨不稳患者胫骨结节-股骨滑车沟间距的可行性分析[J].河北医科大学学报,2020,41(6):660-664.
作者姓名:张合  曹成明  兰志恒  赵志光  刘巍  韩守江
作者单位:1.冀中能源峰峰集团有限公司总医院邯郸院区骨三科,河北 邯郸 056000;2.冀中能源峰峰集团有限公司总医院邯郸院区骨五科,河北 邯郸 056000
摘    要:目的 探讨改良单图像法手工测量髌骨不稳患者胫骨结节-股骨滑车沟(tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove,TT-TG)间距的可行性。 方法 选取髌骨不稳患者30例。高年资手术医师A、B,使用改良单图像法手工测量髌骨不稳患者TT-TG间距,对比高资年影像学医师C,使用双图法测量髌骨不稳患者TT-TG间距。应用Cronbach′s alpha系数评价结果的可信度。应用组内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficient,ICC)评价结果的可重复性。使用Bland-Altman分析图评价结果的一致性。 结果 高年资手术医师A、B使用改良单图像法手工测量髌骨不稳患者TT-TG间距分别和高年资影像学医师C使用双图法测量髌骨不稳患者TT-TG间距比较,Cronbach′s alpha系数分别为0.913和0.959,组内相关系数分别为0.913和0.958。Bland-Altman分析图显示,TT-TG间距差值(mm)的均值为-0.276(95%CI:-3.526~2.974)和0.143(95%CI:-3.110~3.397)。A、B医师之间使用改良单图像法手工测量髌骨不稳患者TT-TG间距比较,Cronbach′s alpha系数为0.891,组内相关系数为0.891。Bland-Altman分析图显示TT-TG间距差值(mm)的均值为-0.276(95%CI:-3.526~2.974)。 结论 改良单图像法手工测量髌骨不稳患者TT-TG间距操作简单,可以准确测量出髌骨不稳患者的TT-TG间距,该方法和双图法可以相互替换使用。

关 键 词:髌骨  胫骨结节-股骨滑车沟间距  核磁共振成像  

The feasibility analysis of the manual measurement of the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in the patient with patellar instability by modified single image method
ZHANG He,CAO Cheng-ming,LAN Zhi-heng,ZHAO Zhi-guang,LIU Wei,HAN Shou-jiang.The feasibility analysis of the manual measurement of the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in the patient with patellar instability by modified single image method[J].Journal of Hebei Medical University,2020,41(6):660-664.
Authors:ZHANG He  CAO Cheng-ming  LAN Zhi-heng  ZHAO Zhi-guang  LIU Wei  HAN Shou-jiang
Affiliation:1.The Third Department of Orthopaedics, Handan Branch of Jizhong Engry Fengfeng Group Hospital,
Hebei Province, Handan 056000, China; 2.The Fifth Department of Orthopaedics, Handan Branch of
Jizhong Engry Fengfeng Group Hospital, Hebei Province, Handan 056000, China
Abstract:Objective To discuss the feasibility of manual measurement of the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove(TT-TG) distance in the patient with patellar instability by modified single image method. Methods Thirty cases patients with patellar instability were selected. Senior surgeons A and B measured the TT-TG distance of patients with patellar instability by modified single-image method and compared with senior radiologist C who measured the TT-TG distance of patients with patellar instability by double-image method.The Cronbach′s alpha coefficient was used to evaluate the reliability of the results.The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the repeatability of the results.The Bland-Altman analysis diagram was used to evaluate the consistency of the results. Results Senior surgeons A and B who measured the TT-TG distance of patients with patellar instability by modified single-image method compared with senior radiologist C who measured the TT-TG distance of patients with patellar instability by double-image method: Cronbach′s alpha coefficients were 0.913 and 0.959, respectively.The intragroup correlation coefficients were 0.913 and 0.958, respectively. The Bland-Altman analysis diagrams showed that the mean of TT-TG distance D-value(mm) was -0.276(95% CI:-3.526-2.974) and 0.143 (95% CI:-3.110-3.397). Senior surgeons A and B used the modified method to measure TT-TG distance manually in patellar instability patients.The Cronbach′s alpha coefficient was 0.891. The intragroup correlation coefficient was 0.891. 〖JP2〗The Bland-Altman analysis showed that the mean of TT-TG distance difference(mm) was -0.276 (95% CI:〖JP〗-3.526-2.974). Conclusion The modified single image method is simple to measure TT-TG distance manually in patients with patellar instability. It can accurately measure TT-TG distance in patients with patellar instability. This method and double image method can be used interchangeably.
Keywords:patella  tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance  magnetic resonance imaging  
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《河北医科大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《河北医科大学学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号