首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

高压注射法和手推法在颅内肿瘤磁共振增强扫描中临床效果观察
引用本文:郭雅茹,张雪峰.高压注射法和手推法在颅内肿瘤磁共振增强扫描中临床效果观察[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2014,46(11):1322-1324.
作者姓名:郭雅茹  张雪峰
作者单位:内蒙古自治区人民医院影像医学科,内蒙古呼和浩特,010017
摘    要:目的 比较高压注射法和手推团注法在MRI增强扫描中临床效果的差异.方法 收集我院2012年4月至2014年4月使用磁显葡胺注射液进行颅内肿瘤磁共振增强检查患者300例,采用前瞻性试验研究,根据不同推注方法进行分组:实验组150例使用高压注射器推注,对照组150例使用手推法团注.结果 高压法增强未出现不良反应的患者,手推法增强患者不良反应率为3%,高压注射法图像质量满意度为98.67%,手推法满意度为94.67%.结论 MRI增强对比时高压注射法较传统手推法更加安全可靠,而且成像效果优于手推法.

关 键 词:MRI  增强扫描  高压注射法  手推法

Observation of MRI Contrast Enhancement with Gd-DTPA-clinical Effect in High Pressure Injector and Hand Bolus Injection
GUO Ya-ru,ZHANG Xue-feng.Observation of MRI Contrast Enhancement with Gd-DTPA-clinical Effect in High Pressure Injector and Hand Bolus Injection[J].Inner Mongolia Medical Journal,2014,46(11):1322-1324.
Authors:GUO Ya-ru  ZHANG Xue-feng
Affiliation:GUO Ya- ru, ZHANG Xue - feng (Department of Medical Imaging, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot 010017 China )
Abstract:Objective To investigate the difference of enhanced effect in intracranial tumor MRI contrast enhancement, and compare the adverse effect in both method. Method In a prospective trial, 300 people who received contrast enhancement with Gd - DTPA since April 2010 to April 2014 were collected and assigned to two group:those receiving high pressure injector(n = 150), those receiving hand bolus injection( n = 150). Results There was no adverse effect happened when we used the high pressure injector, and the The incidence of adverse effect with hand bolus injection was 3 %. degree of satisfaction of high pressure injector is 98.67 %,which is 94.67 % in hand bolus injection. Conclusion High pressure injector is safer than hand bolus injection in MRI contrast enhancement , and the high pressure injector has a better quality than hand bolus injection.
Keywords:MRI  contrast enhancement  high pressure injector  hand bolus injection
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号