首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

热毒宁注射液青蒿金银花浓缩过程近红外快速定量检测方法的建立
引用本文:王永香,郑伟然,米慧娟,李璐,毕宇安,王振中,萧伟.热毒宁注射液青蒿金银花浓缩过程近红外快速定量检测方法的建立[J].中草药,2017,48(1):102-108.
作者姓名:王永香  郑伟然  米慧娟  李璐  毕宇安  王振中  萧伟
作者单位:江苏康缘药业股份有限公司, 江苏 连云港 222001;中药制药过程新技术国家重点实验室, 江苏 连云港 222001;江苏康缘药业股份有限公司, 江苏 连云港 222001;中药制药过程新技术国家重点实验室, 江苏 连云港 222001;江苏康缘药业股份有限公司, 江苏 连云港 222001;中药制药过程新技术国家重点实验室, 江苏 连云港 222001;江苏康缘药业股份有限公司, 江苏 连云港 222001;中药制药过程新技术国家重点实验室, 江苏 连云港 222001;江苏康缘药业股份有限公司, 江苏 连云港 222001;中药制药过程新技术国家重点实验室, 江苏 连云港 222001;江苏康缘药业股份有限公司, 江苏 连云港 222001;中药制药过程新技术国家重点实验室, 江苏 连云港 222001;江苏康缘药业股份有限公司, 江苏 连云港 222001;中药制药过程新技术国家重点实验室, 江苏 连云港 222001
基金项目:国家科技部“国家重大新药创制”项目:现代中药创新集群与数字制药技术平台(2013ZX09402203)
摘    要:目的建立热毒宁注射液青蒿金银花醇沉浓缩过程主要药效成分的定量校正模型,实现生产过程在线监控。方法采用近红外光谱技术(NIRS)结合偏最小二乘法(PLSR)分别建立新绿原酸、绿原酸、隐绿原酸的定量校正模型。结果新绿原酸、绿原酸、隐绿原酸定量校正模型的决定系数(R~2)分别为0.954 5、0.975 2、0.9691;校正集误差均方根(RMSEC)为0.213、0.676、0.225,交叉验证集误差均方根(RMSECV)分别为0.233、0.692、0.258。采用所建模型进行在线分析,新绿原酸、绿原酸、隐绿原酸的预测值与实测值的决定系数分别为0.984 2、0.983 7、0.9870,预测相对误差(RPD)分别为4.77、5.29、4.37,预测相对偏差(RSEP)分别为3.519%、3.778%、3.895%。结论所建的模型可以用于热毒宁注射液青蒿金银花醇沉浓缩过程中新绿原酸、绿原酸、隐绿原酸的在线定量测定。

关 键 词:近红外光谱  偏最小二乘法  热毒宁注射液  青蒿金银花醇沉浓缩  定量校正模型  新绿原酸  绿原酸  隐绿原酸
收稿时间:2016/8/24 0:00:00

Fast measurement method based on near-infrared spectroscopy in concentration of alcohol precipitation proee for Artemisiae Annuae Herba and Lonicerae Flos in Reduning Injection
WANG Yong-xiang,ZHENG Wei-ran,MI Hui-juan,LI Lu,BI Yu-an,WANG Zhen-zhong and XIAO Wei.Fast measurement method based on near-infrared spectroscopy in concentration of alcohol precipitation proee for Artemisiae Annuae Herba and Lonicerae Flos in Reduning Injection[J].Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs,2017,48(1):102-108.
Authors:WANG Yong-xiang  ZHENG Wei-ran  MI Hui-juan  LI Lu  BI Yu-an  WANG Zhen-zhong and XIAO Wei
Affiliation:Jiangsu Kanion Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Lianyungang 222001, China;State Key Laboratory of New-tech for Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process, Lianyungang 222001, China;Jiangsu Kanion Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Lianyungang 222001, China;State Key Laboratory of New-tech for Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process, Lianyungang 222001, China;Jiangsu Kanion Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Lianyungang 222001, China;State Key Laboratory of New-tech for Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process, Lianyungang 222001, China;Jiangsu Kanion Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Lianyungang 222001, China;State Key Laboratory of New-tech for Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process, Lianyungang 222001, China;Jiangsu Kanion Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Lianyungang 222001, China;State Key Laboratory of New-tech for Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process, Lianyungang 222001, China;Jiangsu Kanion Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Lianyungang 222001, China;State Key Laboratory of New-tech for Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process, Lianyungang 222001, China;Jiangsu Kanion Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Lianyungang 222001, China;State Key Laboratory of New-tech for Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process, Lianyungang 222001, China
Abstract:Objective The calibration models were developed in the concentration of alcohol precipitation proee for Artemisiae Annuae Herba (AAH) and Lonicerae Flos (LF) in Reduning Injection (RI) to realize the on-line monitoring of production process. Methods Based on the near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS), partial least regression (PLS) models were developed to fast measure the contents of neochlorogenic acid, chlorogenic acid, and 4-O-caffeoylquinic acid in the concentration of the alcohol precipitation proee for AAH and LF. Results In the quantitative models of neochlorogenic acid, chlorogenic acid, and 4-O-caffeoylquinic acid, the coefficient of determination (R2) of cross validation sets were 0.954 5, 0.975 2, and 0.969 1; The root mean square errors of calibration (RMSEC) were 0.213, 0.676, and 0.225; The root mean square errors of cross-validation (RMSECV) were 0.233, 0.692, and 0.258. When the established models were applied to on-line monitoring, the coefficient of determination of neochlorogenic acid, chlorogenic acid, and 4-O-caffeoylquinic acid were 0.984 2, 0.983 7, and 0.987 0, the residual predictive deviation (RPD) were 4.77, 5.29, and 4.37; The relative standard errors of prediction (RSEP) were 3.519%, 3.778%, and 3.895%. Conclusion The models above are proved to fast measure the contents of neochlorogenic acid, chlorogenic acid, and 4-O-caffeoylquinic acid in the concentration of alcohol precipitation proee for AAH and LF in RI.
Keywords:near infrared spectroscopy technology  partial least squares  Reduning Injection  concentration of alcohol precipitation proee for Artemisiae Annuae Herba and Lonicerae Flos  rapid quantitative analysis models  neochlorogenic acid  chlorogenin acid  cryptochlorogenin acid
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中草药》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中草药》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号