|
|||||
|
|
| 不同检测方法对粪类圆线虫钩虫检出率的比较 | |
| 引用本文： | 杜尊伟,姜进勇,Peter Steinmann,王剑,周卉,吕山,王学忠,刀天有,刀宏祥,朱建平,张老三,陈绍秋,倪坎,陈然,苏梅惠,李鸿兵,车英,周晓农.不同检测方法对粪类圆线虫钩虫检出率的比较[J].中国血吸虫病防治杂志,2009,21(1):64-66. |
| 作者姓名： | 杜尊伟 姜进勇 Peter Steinmann 王剑 周卉 吕山 王学忠 刀天有 刀宏祥 朱建平 张老三 陈绍秋 倪坎 陈然 苏梅惠 李鸿兵 车英 周晓农 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 云南省寄生虫病防治所,普洱,665000 2. Department of Public Health and Epidemiology,Swiss Tropical,Institute,Switzerland 3. 中国疾病预防控制中心奇生虫病预防控制所 4. 云南省西双版纳州疾病预防控制中心 5. 云南省勐海县疾病预防控制中心 |
| 摘 要： | 目的用不同方法检查粪便中的粪类圆线虫和钩虫,掌握检测粪类圆线虫的方法。方法在云南省勐海县选择土源性线虫感染率相对高的自然村1个,以户为单位随机抽样,采用改良加藤法（Kato-Katz法）、Koga法和Baerm ann法3种粪便检查方法对粪样进行检查,每人送检粪样3次。结果粪类圆线虫阳性率Kato-Katz法为0,Koga法为11.72%,Baerm ann法为12.55%。钩虫阳性率Kato-Katz法为64.44%,Koga法为57.74%,Baerm ann法为4.60%。结论Baer-m ann法仅适用于粪类圆线虫检测,Koga法可用作钩虫和粪类圆线虫检测,而Kato-Katz法仅适用于钩虫检测。 |
| 关 键 词： | 粪类圆线虫 钩虫 改良加藤法 Koga法 Baermann法 诊断 |
Comparison of diagnostic methods in detection of Strongyloides stercoralis and hookworm |
|
| Du Zun-wei,Jiang Jin-yong,Peter Steinmann,Wang Jian,Zhou Hui,Lv Shan,Wang Xue-zhong,Dao Tian-you,Dao Hong-xiang,Zhu Jian-ping,Zhang Lao-san,Chen Shao-qiu,Ni Kan,Chen Ran,Su Mei-hui,Li Hong-bing,Che Ying,Zhou Xiao-nong.Comparison of diagnostic methods in detection of Strongyloides stercoralis and hookworm[J].Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control,2009,21(1):64-66. | |
| Authors: | Du Zun-wei Jiang Jin-yong Peter Steinmann Wang Jian Zhou Hui Lv Shan Wang Xue-zhong Dao Tian-you Dao Hong-xiang Zhu Jian-ping Zhang Lao-san Chen Shao-qiu Ni Kan Chen Ran Su Mei-hui Li Hong-bing Che Ying Zhou Xiao-nong |
| Affiliation: | Du Zun-wei,Jiang Jin-yong,Peter Steinmann,Wang Jian,Zhou Hui,Lv Shan,Wang Xue-zhong,Dao Tian-you,Dao Hong-xiang,Zhu Jian-ping,Zhang Lao-san,Chen Shao-qiu,Ni Kan,Chen Ran,Su Mei-hui,Li Hong-bing,Che Ying,Zhou Xiao-nong (1. Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases,Puer 665000,China;2. Department of Public Health and Epidemiology,Swiss Tropical Institute,Switzerland;3. National Institute of Parasitic Diseases,Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention,China;4. Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture Center for Disease Control and Prevention,China;5. Menghai County Center for Disease Control and Prevention,China ) |
| Abstract: | A village with high infection rate of soil-transmitted nematodes in Menghai County,Yunnan Province was selected as the study area,and 239 individuals were randomly sampled for the experiment.Three stool samples were collected from each individual,and each stool sample was processed with the Kato-Katz,Koga and Baermann techniques for detection of Strongyloides stercoralis and hookworm.The detection rate of Strongyloides stercoralis was 0 using the Kato-Katz technique,11.72% using the Koga technique and 12.55% using the Baermann technique,while the detection rate of hookworm was 64.44% using the Kato-Katz technique,57.74% using the Koga technique and 4.60% using the Baermann technique.In conclusion,the Baermann technique is only suitable for detection of Strongyloides stercoralis,and the Kato-Katz technique only for detection of hookworm,while the Koga technique can be used for detection of Strongyloides stercoralis and hookworm. |
| Keywords: | Strongyloides stercoralis Hookworm Kato-Katz technique Koga technique Baermann technique Diagnosis |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |
| 点击此处可从《中国血吸虫病防治杂志》浏览原始摘要信息 | |
| 点击此处可从《中国血吸虫病防治杂志》下载全文 | |
