首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

ORK—CAM角膜像差引导的LASIK治疗高度散光的临床评价
引用本文:姚达强,沙翔垠,李林,叶翠玉,丁宇虹,刘咏仪,李玥瑶.ORK—CAM角膜像差引导的LASIK治疗高度散光的临床评价[J].中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志,2012,12(6):379-382.
作者姓名:姚达强  沙翔垠  李林  叶翠玉  丁宇虹  刘咏仪  李玥瑶
作者单位:广州医学院第二附属医院眼科,广州,510260
摘    要:目的评价ORK—CAM角膜波前像差引导的个性化LASIK治疗高度散光的临床效果。方法采用随机对照研究,选择近视性散光(验光度数和轴向与角膜地形图数据大致相同)32.00D,等值球镜度≤8.00D的67例(89眼)患者采用随机表分为两组,ORK—CAM组39例(53眼)接受ORK.CAM非球面切削的LASIK治疗;LASIK组28例(36眼)接受传统LASIK治疗。两组术前球镜度数分别为(-4.23±1.31)D和(-4.42±1.58)D(P〉0.05);柱镜度数分别为(2.50±0.52)D和-(2.49±0.47)D(P〉0.05)。平均随访6个月,手术前后观察患者视力、屈光度、高阶像差、Q值变化和对比敏感度等情况。结果ORK.CAM组和LASIK组术后球镜度数分别为(-0.14±0.76)D和(-0.12±0.82)D(P〉0.05);柱镜数度分别为(-0.51±0.63)D和(-0.98±1.21)D(P〈0.01)。裸眼视力≥1.0者分别占81%和80%(P〉0.05);术后慧差分别为(0.33±0.15)μm和(0.42±0.27)μm(P〈0.05);球差分别为(0.51±0.24)μm和(0.92±0.32)μm(P〈0.01);Q值分别为0.55±0.34和1.17±1.23(P〈0.001);ORK—CAM组1个月时对比敏感度恢复到术前水平,而LASIK组3个月时才接近术前水平。结论ORK—CAM角膜波前像差引导的个性化LASIK治疗近视性高度散光的像差矫正优于传统LASIK。

关 键 词:准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术  个性化切削  角膜地形图

Clinic evaluation of topography guided LASIK for high astigmatism treatment
YAO Da-qiang , SHA Xiang-yin , LI Lin , YE Cui-yu , DING Yu-hong , LIU Yong-yi , LI Yue-yao.Clinic evaluation of topography guided LASIK for high astigmatism treatment[J].Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology and otorhinolaryngology,2012,12(6):379-382.
Authors:YAO Da-qiang  SHA Xiang-yin  LI Lin  YE Cui-yu  DING Yu-hong  LIU Yong-yi  LI Yue-yao
Affiliation:YAO Da-qiang, SHA Xiang-yin, LI Lin ,YE Cui-yu, DING Yu-hong, LIU Yong-yi, LI Yue-yao. Department of Ophthalmology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College, Guangzhou 510260, China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinic effect of topography guided (Optimized Refractive Keratectomy- Custom Ablation Manager, ORK-CAM) laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for high astigmatism treatment. Methods Sixty-seven cases (89 eyes) with high corneal astigmatism were randomly divided into ORK-CAM group (39 cases, 53 eyes) which accepted Schwind Esiris ORK-CAM topography-guided LASIK and LASIK group (28 cases, 36 eyes) which accepted standard small optical zones flying-spot ablation LASIK. The preoperative average subjective spherical refraction was ( -4.23±1.31)D,( -4.42±1.58)D,and cylindrical refraction was ( -2.50 ±0.52)D, ( -2.49 ±0.47)D in ORK-CAM group and LASIK group respectively (P 〉 0.05). All cases were followed up for 6 months. Results The postoperative subjective refraction was ( -0.14 ±0.76) D and ( -0.12±0.82) D (P 〉0.05), and cylindrical refrac- tion was ( - 0.51±0.63) D and ( - 0.98±1.21 ) D (P 〈 0.01 ) in ORK-CAM group and LASIK group respectively. Eighty-one percent of the ORK-CAM group achieved 1.0 or better visual acuity while that in the comparative group was 80%. There was no significant difference of postoperative visual acuity between two groups (P 〉 0.05 ). The coma was (0.33±0.15) μm and (0.42±0.27) μm (P〈0.05), the spherical aberration was (0.51±0.24) μm and (0.92±0.32)μm (P 〈0.01 ), and the Q-value was 0.55±0.34 and 1.17±1.23(P 〈0.001 ) in ORK-CAM group and LASIK group respectively. One month after operation, the contrast sensitivity of ORK-CAM group returned to their pre-operative level, and that of LASIK group returned to preoperative level at the third months after operation. Conclusions ORK- CAM topography guided LASIK for high corneal astigmatism treatment is superior to conventional LASIK.
Keywords:Laser in situ keratomileusis  Customized ablation  Topography-guided
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号