首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     


A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer
Authors:Giovanni Montesano  Susan R Bryan  David P Crabb  Paolo Fogagnolo  Francesco Oddone  Allison M McKendrick  Andrew Turpin  Paolo Lanzetta  Andrea Perdicchi  Chris A Johnson  David F Garway-Heath  Paolo Brusini  Luca M Rossetti
Affiliation:1. University of Milan – ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy;2. City, University of London, Optometry and Visual Sciences, London, United Kingdom;3. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom;4. G. B. Bietti Eye Foundation-IRCCS, Rome, Italy;5. University of Melbourne, Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Melbourne, Australia;6. University of Melbourne, School of Computing and Information System, Melbourne, Australia;7. Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, Ophthalmology Unit, University of Udine, Udine, Italy;8. Ophthalmology Unit, St. Andrea Hospital, NESMOS Department, University of Rome “Sapienza,” Rome, Italy;9. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa;10. Department of Ophthalmology, “Città di Udine” Health Center, Udine, Italy
Abstract:
Keywords:CI  confidence interval  CMP  Compass  D  diopters  dB  decibels  GON  glaucomatous optic neuropathy  HFA  Humphrey Field Analyzer  MD  mean deviation  MS  mean sensitivity  ONH  optic nerve head  pAUC  partial area under the curve  pROC  partial receiver operating characteristic curve  PSD  pattern standard deviation  RNFL  retinal nerve fiber layer  SD  standard deviation  SITA  Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm  TD  total deviation  VF  visual field  ZEST  Zippy Estimation by Sequential Testing
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号