首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜治疗肾下盏小鹿角形结石的比较
引用本文:宋生生,顾志文,谭日钊,谭礼林,贾晨尧,郑彬.经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜治疗肾下盏小鹿角形结石的比较[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2022,16(6):534-538.
作者姓名:宋生生  顾志文  谭日钊  谭礼林  贾晨尧  郑彬
作者单位:1. 528031 广东,佛山复星禅诚医院泌尿外科
基金项目:广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(B2017043); 佛山市卫生健康局医学科研课题(20190182); 佛山市自筹经费类科技计划项目(1920001001620)
摘    要:目的比较经皮肾镜(PCNL)与输尿管软镜(FURS)治疗肾下盏小鹿角形结石的安全性及有效性。 方法回顾性纳入并分析我院2017年4月至2019年4月43例肾下盏小鹿角形结石,其中PCNL治疗20例(PCNL组),FURS治疗23例(FURS组),比较两组手术时间、结石清除率、手术并发症和术后住院天数等。 结果43例均顺利完成手术,PCNL组的手术时间、术后住院天数均显著长于FURS组(P<0.05);术后1~4 d PCNL组结石清除率85.0%,显著高于FURS组52.2%,术后4周及术后半年两组结石清除率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但FURS组的二次干预率更高(P<0.05);两组在术后发热、出血及石街形成等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但PCNL组的血红蛋白丢失量及术后止痛药使用率更高(P<0.05)。 结论PCNL与FURS在治疗肾下盏小鹿角形结石均安全、有效,两者远期疗效相当,但FURS比PCNL创伤更小,术后恢复更快,值得临床推广。

关 键 词:经皮肾镜  输尿管软镜  肾下盏结石  鹿角形结石  
收稿时间:2022-06-10

Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of lower pole minor staghorn calculi
Authors:Shengsheng Song  Zhiwen Gu  Rizhao Tan  Lilin Tan  Chenyao Jia  Bin Zheng
Affiliation:1. Department of Urology, Foshan Fosun Chancheng Hospital, Guangdong 528031, China
Abstract:ObjectiveTo compare the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL) and flexible ureteroscopy(FURS) in treatment of lower pole minor staghorn calculi. MethodsFrom April 2017 to April 2019, 43 patients having lower pole minor staghorn calculi were treated with PCNL or FURS in our hospital. The patients were all retrospectively investigated and classified as PCNL group or FURS group. Of them, 20 patients received PCNL and 23 underwent FURS, respectively. The two groups were compared and analyzed statistically in terms of operation time, stone-free rate, surgical-related complications rate and postoperative hospital stay. ResultsSuccessful surgery had been done in all the patients. Operation time and postoperative hospital stay of the PCNL group were significantly longer than that of the FURS group (P<0.05). In PCNL group, initial stone-free rate(SFR) in 4 days after surgeries achieved 85.0%, which was significantly higher than that of 52.2% in FURS group (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of overall SFR in 4 weeks and 6 months after surgeries, respectively (P>0.05). Nevertheless, the need for further intervention(staged FURS surgery or ESWL) in the FURS group was significantly more than that in the PCNL group (P<0.05). Complication rate between the two groups was similar in terms of postoperative fever, bleeding and steinstrasse (P>0.05), but the PCNL group suffered more loss of hemoglobin and postoperative pain (P<0.05). ConclusionsBoth PCNL and FURS are safe and feasible for patients with minor renal staghorn calculi in the lower pole. Compared to PCNL, FURS deserves its priority to deal with lower pole minor staghorn calculi for its less invasive and faster postoperative recovery.
Keywords:Percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL)  Flexible ureteroscopy(FURS)  Lower pole stone  Staghorn calculi  
点击此处可从《中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号