首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     


Quantitative risk assessment using a Japanese hydrogen refueling station model
Authors:Tomoya Suzuki  Kento Shiota  Yu-ichiro Izato  Masahiro Komori  Koichi Sato  Yasuyuki Takai  Takayuki Ninomiya  Atsumi Miyake
Affiliation:1. Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, 79–7 Tokiwadai, Hodogaya–ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 240–8501, Japan;2. Institute of Advanced Sciences, Yokohama National University, 79–5 Tokiwadai, Hodogaya–ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 240–8501, Japan;3. Faculty of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, 79–7 Tokiwadai, Hodogaya–ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 240–8501, Japan;4. Japan Petroleum Energy Center, 2–11–1 Shibakoen, Minato–ku, Tokyo, 105–0011, Japan
Abstract:Although hydrogen refueling stations (HRSs) are becoming widespread across Japan and are essential for the operation of fuel cell vehicles, they present potential hazards. A large number of accidents such as explosions or fires have been reported, rendering it necessary to conduct a number of qualitative and quantitative risk assessments for HRSs. Current safety codes and technical standards related to Japanese HRSs have been established based on the results of a qualitative risk assessment and quantitative effectiveness validation of safety measures over ten years ago. In the last decade, there has been much development in the technologies of the components or facilities used in domestic HRSs and much operational experience as well as knowledge to use hydrogen in HRSs safely have been gained through years of commercial operation. The purpose of the present study is to conduct a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the latest HRS model representing Japanese HRSs with the most current information and to identify the most significant scenarios that pose the greatest risks to the physical surroundings in the HRS model. The results of the QRA show that the risk contours of 10?3 and 10?4 per year were confined within the HRS boundaries, whereas the risk contours of 10?5 and 10?6 per year are still present outside the HRS. Comparing the breakdown of the individual risks (IRs) at the risk ranking points, we conclude that the risk of jet fire demonstrates the highest contribution to the risks at all of the risk ranking points and outside the station. To reduce these risks and confine the risk contour of 10?6 per year within the HRS boundaries, it is necessary to consider risk mitigation measures for jet fires.
Keywords:Quantitative risk assessment  Hydrogen refueling station  Individual risk  Jet fire
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号