Parliamentary technology assessment institutions as indications of reflexive modernization |
| |
| Authors: | Pierre Delvenne Catherine Fallon Sébastien Brunet |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Université de Toulouse, Institut Carnot Cirimat, UMR 5085 CNRS, Université Toulouse III Paul-Sabatier-INPT, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse Cedex 9, France;2. CNRS, CEMES, UPR 8011 and Université de Toulouse, 29 Rue Jeanne Marvig, 31055 Toulouse, France;3. CNRS, Institut Carnot CIRIMAT, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31602 Toulouse Cedex 9, France;1. Área de Arqueología y Paleontología, IVCR, CulurArts Generalitat, Genaro Lahuerta 25, 46010, Valencia, Spain;2. Departamento de Prehistoria y Aqueologia, Universitat de Valencia, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 28, 46010, Valencia, Spain;1. School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada;2. Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada;3. Funding Reform and Case Costing, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada;4. Boris Family Center for Robotic Surgery Research Program, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada;5. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada;6. Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada;7. St. Joseph''s Home Care, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada;1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Molinette Hospital, SGAS, Via Cavour 31, 10123 Torino, Italy;2. Department of Pathology, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy;3. SISS Department, Interuniversitary Center CINECA, Bologna, Italy |
| |
| Abstract: | This article links the theory of reflexive modernization to Parliamentary Technology Assessment (PTA) by considering the latter as an indication of modern Western societies becoming more reflexive, that is, acknowledging and responding to the limitations of modern traditions by institutionalizing new processes of technology assessment to address a realm of change where uncertainty is no longer contained within modern structures. Our conceptual framework must address both the emergence and functioning of PTA in the form of institutions and the practices that are pursued within (or around, and linked to) such institutions, with due attention being paid to the multiple approaches currently being debated around the transformation of modernity and reflexivity. Reflexive modernization offers a relevant theoretical approach to analyzing hybrid entities like PTA institutions. We demonstrate this by analyzing three such institutions (Science and Technology Options Assessment STOA, European Parliament], Institute for Society and Technology IST, Flanders, Belgium] and Rathenau Institute The Netherlands]), mapping their different approaches and practices in terms of features of reflexive modernization. There appears to be an overall reflexivity pathway, on which some PTAs have moved farther than others, but their progress is fractured by the resilience of modern institutions. We conclude that to ensure their role in the current institutional landscapes of evolving modern societies, the most important thing for PTA institutions is therefore to somehow develop a relevant approach while dealing with the necessary margin of maneuver for further adaptation and transformation. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
