首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于3种方法对河道底泥重金属污染评价
引用本文:舒伟,陈玥,高阳俊.基于3种方法对河道底泥重金属污染评价[J].上海第二工业大学学报,2018(1):1-9.
作者姓名:舒伟  陈玥  高阳俊
作者单位:上海环科环境认证有限公司;荷兰瓦格宁根大学;上海市环境科学研究院
基金项目:上海市环境科学研究院科技创新项目(CX201503) 资助
摘    要:通过查阅国内外共97篇文献,获得了14种重金属在国内外河道底泥中的污染情况,通过统计分析,得到了国内外重金属污染的整体情况。运用潜在生态风险指数法、地积累指数法、富集因子法这3种常见的重金属评价方法,对国内外重金属的污染情况进行了评价。结果发现,国内外对重金属的研究在种类、频次上都存在较大差别,国内外河道底泥中的重金属含量差别也较大。3种评价方法的侧重点和原理不同,对国内外重金属的污染情况评价结果也不尽相同。

关 键 词:河道底泥    重金属    潜在生态风险指数法    地积累指数法    富集因子法

Evaluation of the Heavy Metal Contamination in River Sediment Basing on Three Methods
SHU Wei,CHEN Yue and GAO Yang-jun.Evaluation of the Heavy Metal Contamination in River Sediment Basing on Three Methods[J].Journal of Shanghai Second Polytechnic University,2018(1):1-9.
Authors:SHU Wei  CHEN Yue and GAO Yang-jun
Affiliation:Shanghai Environmental Science and Environmental Certification Co.,Wageningen University and Shanghai Academy of Environmental Science
Abstract:The contamination of river sediments about 14 heavy metals had been obtained referring to 97 articles from home and abroad. By statistical analysis, the overall situation had been achieved. Potential ecological risk index, geo-accumulation index and enrichment factor were chosen to evaluate the contamination of heavy metals from home and abroad. The three methods were all commonly used in assessment of heavy metals pollution. The results indicated the species and frequency of heavy metals were significantly different between domestic and abroad research. The contents of heavy metals of river sediments were various at home and abroad. Because of different principles and emphases focused on, the assessment results of the three evaluating methods were inconsistent.
Keywords:river sediment  heavy metals  potential ecological risk index  geo-accumulation index  enrichment factor
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《上海第二工业大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《上海第二工业大学学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号