首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

土地市场化程度的地区差异分析
引用本文:唐鹏,李建强,肖君.土地市场化程度的地区差异分析[J].资源与产业,2010,12(6):161-166.
作者姓名:唐鹏  李建强  肖君
作者单位:(四川农业大学 经济管理学院,四川 雅安 625014)
摘    要:分析土地市场化程度的发展状况及其地区差异对政府更加科学的利用土地调控手段和参与宏观管理具有重要意义。本文从土地市场交易结构出发,测算了我国省级地区1999-2007年土地市场化程度,并利用聚类分析方法考察了其地区差异。研究结果表明:我国土地市场化程度总体偏低,呈现缓慢、波动上升趋势;东部地区市场化程度高于中部、西部和东北地区,但区域间差距在逐渐缩小。对全国31个省级地区差异分析表明:市场化程度最高的是黑龙江、上海、江苏等9个地区,市场化程度最低的是新疆、甘肃等5个地区。同时,天津、山东等省份虽地处东部经济发达地区,但土地市场化程度较低。西部地区的重庆、四川等地区土地市场化程度则较高。

关 键 词:土地市场  市场化程度  差异分析
收稿时间:2010-01-28
修稿时间:2010-11-01

REGIONAL DIFFERENCE OF LAND MARKETIZATION LEVEL
TANG Peng,LI Jian-qiang,XIAO Jun.REGIONAL DIFFERENCE OF LAND MARKETIZATION LEVEL[J].Resources & Industries,2010,12(6):161-166.
Authors:TANG Peng  LI Jian-qiang  XIAO Jun
Affiliation:(School of Economics and Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, China)
Abstract:It is of significance to analyze the marketization level and regional difference in governmental controls on land. This paper, from land market trading structure, estimates the marketization level of China’s provincial areas during 1999 to 2007, and studies their regional difference by means of clustering method. The results indicate a gross low marketization level in China, a slow by fluctuation rising trend. The eastern areas are higher than the central, western and northeastern China, but their difference is becoming small. Based on national 31 provincial areas, 9 areas including Heilongjiang, Shanghai and Jiangsu rank the top, while other 5 areas including Xinjiang and Gansu are lowest in marketization level. At the same time, Tianjin and Shandong are low in land marketization level although they are located in eastern economic developed area, while Chongqing and Sichuan are higher in western China.
Keywords:land market  marketization level  difference analysis
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《资源与产业》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《资源与产业》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号