| 中欧美强夯法地基处理对比 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 梅涛涛,王德咏,王 新,何丽平.中欧美强夯法地基处理对比[J].水运工程,2019(2):118-121. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 梅涛涛 王德咏 王 新 何丽平 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中交四航工程研究院有限公司，广东 广州 510230,中交四航工程研究院有限公司，广东 广州 510231,中交四航工程研究院有限公司，广东 广州 510232,中交四航工程研究院有限公司，广东 广州 510233 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 针对目前广泛遇到的海外港口建设工程中强夯设计参数选择和强夯施工监测等问题,详细对比分析了中、欧、美规范和手册中强夯法适合土类、设计参数和施工监控等。对比发现,中、欧、美规范和手册关于强夯法最大的不同之处在于设计理念,欧、美广泛采用能量法设计施工参数,而中国则通过强夯后的加固效果指导施工参数的选择。
|
| 关 键 词： | 强夯法 地基处理 中、欧、美规范 |
Comparison of ground improvement by dynamic compaction in Chinese,European and American codes |
| |
| MEI Tao-tao,WANG De-yong,WANG Xin and HE Li-ping.Comparison of ground improvement by dynamic compaction in Chinese,European and American codes[J].Port & Waterway Engineering,2019(2):118-121. |
| |
| Authors: | MEI Tao-tao WANG De-yong WANG Xin and HE Li-ping |
| |
| Affiliation: | CCCC Fourth Harbor Engineering Institute Co.,Ltd.,Guangzhou 510230,China,CCCC Fourth Harbor Engineering Institute Co.,Ltd.,Guangzhou 510231,China,CCCC Fourth Harbor Engineering Institute Co.,Ltd.,Guangzhou 510232,China and CCCC Fourth Harbor Engineering Institute Co.,Ltd.,Guangzhou 510233,China |
| |
| Abstract: | Aiming at the problems of selecting design parameters of dynamic compaction and monitoring of dynamic compaction construction in overseas port construction projects,this paper compares and analyzes in detail the Chinese,European and American codes and the manual of dynamic compaction suitable improvement soil,design parameters and construction monitoring.By comparison,it is found that the biggest difference among Chinese,European and American codes and manuals on dynamic compaction method lies in the design concept.Energy method is widely used to design construction parameters in Europe and America,while in China,the selection of construction parameters is guided by the reinforcement effect after dynamic compaction. |
| |
| Keywords: | dynamic compaction ground improvement Chinese European and American codes |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《水运工程》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《水运工程》下载全文 |
|
