首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

中欧(英法)普速铁路重力式挡土墙设计对比分析
引用本文:陈豪,柳刚.中欧(英法)普速铁路重力式挡土墙设计对比分析[J].路基工程,2021,0(5):1-7.
作者姓名:陈豪  柳刚
作者单位:中交第二公路勘察设计研究院有限公司,武汉 430052
基金项目:中交第二公路勘察设计研究院有限公司企业基金项目(KJFZ-2017-054-001)
摘    要:为提高中国工程师对Eurocode 7规范体系的理解和掌握,分析了中欧普速铁路重力式挡土墙设计规范体系,并以某普速铁路重力式路堑挡土墙为算例,按中欧规范运用GEO5软件做检算对比。结果表明:按欧洲规范设计的挡土墙尺寸比中国规范大;中欧规范设计输入参数有差异,欧洲规范卡柯土压力计算结果比中国规范大;中欧规范抗滑移和抗倾覆原理基本相同,偏心距限值和地基承载力差异较大;一般情况下,中国规范检算通过且优化尺寸后的重力式挡土墙不能通过欧洲规范检算。

关 键 词:重力式挡土墙    Eurocode  7    规范对比分析    土压力    GEO5软件
收稿时间:2020-12-24

Comparative Analysis on the Design of Gravity Retaining Wall of Sino-European Conventional Railway (UK and France)
Abstract:In order to improve Chinese engineers' understanding and mastery of Eurocode7 system, we analyzed the design codes system of gravity retaining wall on the Sino-European conventional railway. And taking a gravity retaining wall in cutting area of conventional railway as an example, it is calculated and compared by using the GEO5 software according to the Sino-European standards. The results show that the dimensions of the gravity retaining wall designed as per Eurocode is larger than that as per the Chinese code. The results show that the design input parameters of the Chinese and European standards are different, and the results of the European standard Caquot earth pressure are larger than that of the Chinese standard; the sliding and overturning resistance principles of the Chinese and European standards are basically the same, but the eccentricity limit and the foundation bearing capacity are quite different; Generally, the gravity retaining wall passed the check and optimized dimensions by the Chinese standards cannot pass the check of European code.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《路基工程》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《路基工程》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号