| 权利能力制度的理想与现实——人法的英特纳雄耐尔之路 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 徐国栋.权利能力制度的理想与现实——人法的英特纳雄耐尔之路[J].北方法学,2007,1(2). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 徐国栋 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 厦门大学法学院罗马法研究所 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文在比较中研究了罗马法和现代民法中的能力制度,得出了前者以自由为基础,后者以平等为基础的结论,进而论证了现代权利能力制度的平等理念遇到的重重挑战,尤其揭示了这一制度的全球化理念的充分展开带来的民法消亡命运。通过展示古今立法者对权利能力制度的不平等运用,特别地反驳了权利能力人人平等的谬见,得出了这种不平等为社会治理所必要的结论。
|
| 关 键 词： | 权利能力 平等 身份 失权 英特纳雄耐尔 民法的消亡 |
The Ideals and Reality of the Institution of Capacity for Rights——The Road to Internationality of Human Right |
| |
| XU Guo-dong.The Ideals and Reality of the Institution of Capacity for Rights——The Road to Internationality of Human Right[J].Northern Legal Science,2007,1(2). |
| |
| Authors: | XU Guo-dong |
| |
| Abstract: | This thesis undertakes a study of the institutions of capacity in the Roman and modern civil laws, coming to the conclusion that the former is based on freedom and that the latter is founded on equality. Further, it expounds and proves the various challenges that the ideas of equality in the modern institution of capacity for rights meet, revealing in particular the fate of withering away of civil law with the full development of the globalization of this institution. Through the display of unequal application of the institution of capacity for rightsby ancient and modern legislators, the article especially refutes the fallacy of equality of capacity for rights, concluding that this inequality is necessary for societal governance. |
| |
| Keywords: | capacity for rights equality identity loss of right internationality withering away of civil law |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
