首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

论我国犯罪构成体系的缺陷与完善
引用本文:聂昭伟.论我国犯罪构成体系的缺陷与完善[J].法律科学,2006,24(5):62-68.
作者姓名:聂昭伟
作者单位:浙江省高级人民法院 浙江
摘    要:由于犯罪构成体系是为刑事诉讼证明实践服务的,因此对于该体系是否存在缺陷以及如何进行完善,均应从刑事证明实践的视角出发。从证明对象上来看,我国犯罪客体属于多余要件,而违法性要件则为遗漏要件;从证明责任分配上来看,由于犯罪构成缺乏推定效力,导致证明责任分配的混乱。为此,在完善我国犯罪构成体系时,需要将违法性要件纳入犯罪客体并划分各要件之间的层次性,以恢复犯罪构成的推定效力,从而实现其对证明责任的合理分配。

关 键 词:犯罪构成  证明对象  证明责任  违法性要件  推定
文章编号:1671-6914(2006)05-0062-(7)
修稿时间:2006年4月3日

On the Drawback and Perfection of Chinese System of Constitution of Crime
Nie Zhao-wei.On the Drawback and Perfection of Chinese System of Constitution of Crime[J].Law Science (Journal of Northwest Institute University of Politics and Law),2006,24(5):62-68.
Authors:Nie Zhao-wei
Affiliation:Nie Zhao - wei
Abstract:When we judge if the system of constitution of crime is perfect and how to perfect it, we should do them from the angle of procedural proof practice, for the function of the criminal constitution is to provide a guide for procedural proof. From the angle of proof object, the object of crime is superfluous and the element of illegality is left out in our constitution of crime; from the angle of burden of proof, the constitution of crime in our country lacks the presumption function, which leads to the confusion in the burden of proof. So we should bring the element of illegality into the constitution of crime to retrieve the presumption function of the constitution about crimes, and satisfy the requirements about the burden of proof.
Keywords:the constitution of crimes  object of proof  the burden of proof  the element of illegality  presumption
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号