首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

物权法定原则批判——兼评《中华人民共和国物权法》第五条
引用本文:杨代雄.物权法定原则批判——兼评《中华人民共和国物权法》第五条[J].法制与社会发展,2007(4).
作者姓名:杨代雄
作者单位:吉林大学法学院 吉林长春130012
摘    要:物权法定原则下的物权体系是封闭性的,不能及时吸纳经济生活实践中涌现出来的新型物权。物权法定原则限制了民事主体的财产自由,违背了私法自治原则,而且没有充分、正当的立法理由。我国《物权法》第五条明确规定了物权法定原则,这是一个不明智的立法选择,将来应当予以废弃,代之以实行物权自由创设主义,以公示性作为物权与债权的区分标准,使物权体系由封闭走向开放。

关 键 词:物权  物权体系  物权法定原则  私法自治  物权法

Critique of the Numerus Clausus Principle:In Addition Commenting Article 5 of Real Right Law of PRC
YANG Dai-xiong.Critique of the Numerus Clausus Principle:In Addition Commenting Article 5 of Real Right Law of PRC[J].Law and Social Development,2007(4).
Authors:YANG Dai-xiong
Abstract:The numerus clausus principle results in a closed real right system,which cannot receive promptly new types of real rights arising from economic practices.The numerus clausus principle restrains civil subjects' freedom in the field of property.It violates the principle of private autonomy without sufficient reasonable grounds.Article 5 of our country's real right law prescribes the numerus clausus principle expressly.This is not a sagacious legislative choice.The numerus clausus principle should be abrogated.In order to keep real right system open,our country's real right law should bestow the freedom to create new types of real rights on civil subjects,and distinguish between real rights and creditor's rights according to whether they have been made known to the public or not.
Keywords:real right  real right system  the numerus clausus principle  private autonomy  real right law
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号