首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

论美国关税法337条款在GATT1994下的合法性——基于国际判例的思考
引用本文:朱鹏飞.论美国关税法337条款在GATT1994下的合法性——基于国际判例的思考[J].对外经济贸易大学学报,2011(1):119-128.
作者姓名:朱鹏飞
作者单位:东南大学法学院,江苏南京211189
基金项目:国家社科基金项目“美国贸易法“‘337条款’——基于国家知识产权战略的研究”的阶段性成果 项目批准号码:09CFX068
摘    要:对337条款在GATT1994下合法性的正确评判,将会影响对337条款的态度及应对策略的制定.20世纪80年代,加拿大和欧共体曾经分别在关贸总协定体系内挑战过337条款的合法性.第一个案件专家组报告肯定了该案中337条款的合法性,第二个案件专家组报告对337条款的合法性总体上予以肯定,但也指出了337条款四个具体违法之...

关 键 词:337条款  GATT1994  国民待遇  一般例外

On Legitimacy of Section 337 of US Tariff Law under GATT1994
Authors:ZHU Peng-fei
Affiliation:ZHU Peng-fei
Abstract:To judge the legitimacy of Section 337 under GATT1994 correctly will influence the attitude and strategy to it.In 1980s,Canada and Europe Community challenged Section 337 under the system of GATT respectively.The first panel report confirmed legitimacy of Section 337 in that case.The second panel report confirmed legitimacy of Section 337 generally,and at the same time,it pointed out four concrete illegitimacies too.In 1994,US enacted The Uruguay Round Agreements Act of 1994,which revised the four points the second panel report mentioned.After the amendment,Section 337 has been consistent with GATT1994.It is very difficult to sue Section 337 for breach of GATT1994.We might sue it in WTO in combination with concrete case.
Keywords:Section 337  GATT1994  National Treatment  General Exception
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号