| 公路线源大气环境影响预测方法对比分析研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 付鹏,潘峰,马岩,安伟铭,莫欣岳,仝纪龙.公路线源大气环境影响预测方法对比分析研究[J].环境科学与管理,2015(8):143-145. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 付鹏 潘峰 马岩 安伟铭 莫欣岳 仝纪龙 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 兰州大学 大气科学学院，甘肃 兰州 730000; 兰州大学环境质量评价研究中心，甘肃 兰州730000;2. 兰州大学 大气科学学院,甘肃 兰州,730000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 文章通过从模式原理、范围和特点等方面对AERMOD大气预测模式与EIAA预测模式进行对比分析，以甘肃省天水段G310国道升级改造项目为例，分别采用AERMOD和EIAA两种模式对交通线源排放的特征污染因子CO在各环境空气敏感点的小时最大浓度进行预测，并对预测值与实测值进行对比分析，探讨两种模式在公路线源大气环境影响预测中的适用性及差异性。以期为今后开展道路交通类建设项目大气环境影响预测评价中模式的选取提供参考和借鉴。
|
| 关 键 词： | AERMOD模式 EIAA模式 公路线源 预测 |
Analysis and Forecast Method of Comparison of Atmospheric Environmental Impact of Road Line Source |
| |
| Abstract: | In this paper, the AERMOD atmospheric forecasting model and EIAA forecast mode are compared with in terms of model principle, range and features.Taking the upgrading project of G310 national road in Tianshui section in Gansu Province as an example, the AERMOD and EIAA were used to predict the maximum hourly concentrations of the pollution factor CO in the air sensitive points of each environment.The forecast value and the measured value were compared and studied to explore the applica-bility and difference of two modes of atmospheric environmental impact of highway .This paper provides reference for the selection of the atmospheric environment of road traffic construction projects in the future . |
| |
| Keywords: | AERMOD model EIAA model highway line source prediction |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
