基于Citespace的全科医学研究对比分析

  目的  探究国内外全科医学研究的现状，热点和前沿，比较国内外全科医学研究之异同。  方法  本研究首先检索和筛选中国知网以及Web of Science数据库中近10年(2009—2019年)相关文献，进一步采用文献计量软件Citespace对检索结果进行分析整理。  结果  在检索时间跨度内，国内的发文量为11 703篇，以杨辉教授、于晓松教授、王爽教授的发文量较为突出，首都医科大学、复旦大学附属中山医院、中国医科大学附属第一医院等机构的发文量排在前列，中国全科医学、全科医生、社区卫生服务、教育、家庭医学成为研究热点的前5位。国外论文数量为77 202篇，LITTLE P为最高产作者，发文116篇，多伦多大学(UNIV TORONTO)在研究机构中排首位，发文量为1 200篇，家庭(family)、随机对照实验(randomized controlled-trial)、初级保健(Primary-care)、全科医学(general-practice)、风险(risk)居研究热点的前5位。  结论  国内全科医学领域文献发表数量增速较快，但高产作者之间缺乏强有力的合作网络。国内外全科医学研究热点侧重方向有所不同，这为我国全科医学发展方向提供了新的思路。 

Comparative analysis of general practice research based on Citespace

Objective To explore the current situation, differences and boundaries of general medical research at home and abroad, and to compare their similarities and differences. Methods In this study, we searched and screened the relevant literatures in recent 10 years(2009-2019) in CNKI and Web of Science database, and then analyzed and sorted out the retrieval results using the bibliometric software Citespace. Results Within the retrieval time span, 11 703 articles were published in China, with Professor YANG Hui, Professor YU Xiaosong and Professor WANG Shuang as the most prominent ones. Capital medical university, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University and other institutions ranked the top in terms of the number of papers issued. The Chinese general medicine, general practitioners, community health services, education and family medicine had become the top five research hotspots. The number of foreign papers was 77 202, LITTLE P was the most prolific author with 116 papers. University of Toronto ranked first in research institutions with 1 200 papers. Family, randomized controlled trial(RCT), primary-care, general-practice and risk had become the top five research hotspots. Conclusion The number of articles published in the field of general practice is increasing rapidly in China, but there is a lack of strong cooperation network between high-yield authors. There are different focuses on general practice research at home and abroad, which provides a new idea for the development direction of general practice in China.