首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

论非法占有目的在合同诈骗罪认定中的作用
引用本文:李杰豪,周铭川.论非法占有目的在合同诈骗罪认定中的作用[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2002,4(4):47-51.
作者姓名:李杰豪  周铭川
作者单位:湘潭大学法学院,湖南,湘潭,411105
摘    要:合同诈骗罪是指以非法占有为目的,在签订履行合同过程中,骗取对方当事人财物数额较大的行为。它的本质在于利用合同进行诈骗,诈骗是在非法占有目的支配下的欺诈,非法占有不等于不法所有。合同的效力、欺诈行为和非法占有目的在合同诈骗罪的认定中起着重要的作用,而关键在于非法占有目的。在合同有效的情况下,行为人收受对方财物之后才产生非法占有目的并实施了欺诈行为的,可能产生违约责任或者构成侵占罪,但在对方给付财物之前,即产生非法占有目的并实施了欺诈行为的,则可能构成诈骗犯罪。同理,在合同无效的情况下,行为人可能构成侵占罪或者诈骗犯罪。合同诈骗与合同欺诈的区别在于有无非法占有目的,合同诈骗罪与一般诈骗行为的区别在于骗取财物是否数额较大,合同诈骗罪与金融诈骗罪存在一定的法条竞合关系,合同诈骗罪与侵占罪的区别在于非法占有目的产生于占有他人财物之前还是之后。

关 键 词:合同诈骗  本质  非法占有  侵占罪  票据诈骗
文章编号:1009-5357(2002)04-0047-05
修稿时间:2002年5月26日

On the role of intention of illegal possession in ascertainment crime of contract swindling
Abstract:The crime of contract swindling refers to such conduct in which the actor,with the intention of illegal possession,swindles the other party out of property which is comparatively big in the course of signing and implementing contract.The nature of the crime is to cheat by way of contract and it is a frandulent conduct controlled by the intention of illegal possession that is defferent from unlawful ownership.The effect of contract,frandulent conduct and the intention of illegal possession play important role in ascertainment of this crime while the intention is the key.In condition that the contract is effective,the actor may shoulder the responsibility of breach or commit the crime of embezzlement if he carries out frandulent conduct under the intention of illegal possession which arises after he accepted the other party's property.The crime of swindling may be committed if the actor intends to cheat before acceptance of property.In the same way commit the crime of embezzlement or swindling when the contract is ineffective.The distinction between contract swindling and fraud is whether the actor has the intention of illegal possession or not.The crime of contract swindling differs from ordinary frandulent conduct in that the amount of property cheated is comparatively big in the case of contract swindling.The crime of contract swindling and financial fraud contain some concurrent stipulations and the difference between the crime of contract swindling and embezzlement is when the intention of illegal possession arises--before or after possession of property of others.
Keywords:contract swindling  nature  illegal possession  crime of embezzlement  commercial paper swindling
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号