论我国的物权变动模式

物权变动立法模式的差异根源于如何运用“民事法律事实”制度来解释、筹划引起物权变动的践行行为。当前各国采用的物权变动模式主要有债权意思主义、债权形式主义和物权形式主义三种类型。对物权变动是否需要公示及公示所起作用的认识差异和对引起物权变动原因的不同认识是确定物权变动模式的主要因素。我国采用以债权形式主义为原则，以债权意思主义为例外的物权变动模式，能够弥补债权意思主义容易导致交易不安全和物权形式主义程序繁琐的缺陷，与我国社会现实和法律传统相协调，当属适当。

On Model of Real Rights's Alteration in Our Country

How to commentate and design the difference of practice which may cause changing of real rights by exercising Legal Fact in Civil Law has decided the difference of legislative model of real rights＇ alteration. There are mainly three types of changing model for real fights in the world Currently. Whether the real rights＇ s alteration requires public summons or not and the different understanding on causation of real fights＇ alteration are the primary factors to confirm the alteration model of real rights. Our changing model of real rights adopt the principle of formalism of creditor＇ s rights with the exception of intentionalism of creditor＇ s rights, which can supply a gap of causing insecure business by intentionalism of creditor＇ s rights and fussy formality caused by formalism of real rights. Such model assorts with our social reality and legal tradition and must be proper.