首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

中美人口贩运问题治理比较研究
引用本文:石金龙,李钢,周俊俊,王嘉宇,黄雨珊,杜梦佳,马雪瑶.中美人口贩运问题治理比较研究[J].热带地理,2022,42(9):1443-1461.
作者姓名:石金龙  李钢  周俊俊  王嘉宇  黄雨珊  杜梦佳  马雪瑶
作者单位:1.西北大学,城市与环境学院,西安 710127;2.西北大学,体育教研部,西安 710127;3.西北大学,陕西省地表系统与环境承载力重点实验室,西安 710127;4.迈阿密大学 教育与人类发展学院,迈阿密 33143
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(41871144);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(16YJAZH028);西北大学“人地关系与空间安全”特色优势团队建设项目(2019)
摘    要:文章基于中美人口贩运历史和现状,从国家方略、法律法规、工作机构、预警系统和受害者救助与安置回归5方面,比较了两国在打击人口贩运方面的优势和劣势。结果发现,中美人口贩运治理国家方略,均是在“以人为本、协同预防、依法打击、积极救助、妥善安置”的框架下制定的。中国更多的是针对打击国内拐卖妇女、儿童犯罪的全面性,而美国则是重点治理商业性跨国人口贩运。中国治理的特色在于自上而下的管理和自下而上的自治,一旦方略、法律法规形成,能够迅速覆盖全国执行;而美国属于联邦制国家,联邦政府与州政府是合作而非隶属关系,加之三权分立与制衡相结合的政治制度和两党制的政党制度,美国治理人口贩运问题的全国执行度、联动性还需进一步考察。最后,就中国如何应对和治理拐卖人口问题提出几点建议,具体包括:1)加大对《中国反对拐卖人口行动计划(2021—2030)》的实施力度,各地需因地制宜地明确行动措施;完善与国家法的衔接并合理吸收借鉴,持续推进针对打击人口拐卖的专门立法,增强应对能力;2)加强国际合作,重视社会建设和治理跨国、跨地域人口拐卖问题;3)细化反拐工作机构,成立专门工作组,设置专项经费,畅通建议渠道;4)构建并完善“团圆系统”配套制度建设。

关 键 词:人口贩运  拐卖人口犯罪  反拐方略  法律法规  预警系统  中国  美国  
收稿时间:2022-06-30

A Comparative Study of Human Trafficking Governance in the United States and China
Jinlong Shi,Gang Li,Junjun Zhou,Jiayu Wang,Yushan Huang,Mengjia Du,Xueyao Ma.A Comparative Study of Human Trafficking Governance in the United States and China[J].Tropical Geography,2022,42(9):1443-1461.
Authors:Jinlong Shi  Gang Li  Junjun Zhou  Jiayu Wang  Yushan Huang  Mengjia Du  Xueyao Ma
Affiliation:1.College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Xi'an 710127, China;2.Department of Physical Education, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China;3.Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Xi'an 710127, China;4.College of Education and Human Development, University of Miami, Miami 33143, United States
Abstract:The paper compares and discusses human trafficking from the perspective of state governance in these two countries; the five different aspect of strategies, laws and regulations, working institutions, police systems, and victim rescue and resettlement are examined. The strengths and weaknesses of the two countries in tackling human trafficking are also compared in this study. National strategies for human trafficking governance in China and the United States are formulated under the framework of "people-oriented, coordinated prevention, legal crackdown, active assistance, and proper resettlement". China is more concerned with combating the domestic trafficking of women and children, whereas the United States focuses on the governance of commercial, transnational human trafficking. China's governance is characterized by top-down management and bottom-up autonomy. Once strategies, laws, and regulations are formed, they can be quickly implemented across the entire country. In the United States, the federal government and state governments are cooperative rather than subordinate, and the separation of powers and two-party political system are other issues that indicate the need for further investigations regarding the national implementation and linkage of the governance of human trafficking. This paper concludes with several recommendations on how China should respond to and combat human trafficking crime, including escalating the implementation of China's Action Plan against Human Trafficking (2021-2030) and taking specific actions based on local conditions; enhancing the connection with the national laws and absorption from them and continuing to promote special legislations targeting human trafficking crimes; attaching greater importance to social construction and govemance of transnational human trafficking through strengthening international cooperation; refining anti-trafficking work organizations and setting up specialized working groups, special funds and smoother channels for suggestions; constructing and perfecting China's "Reunion System" supporting system.
Keywords:human trafficking  human trafficking crime  strategy combating human trafficking crime  laws and regulations  pre-warning system  China  United States  
点击此处可从《热带地理》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《热带地理》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号