首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

基底节脑出血开颅手术与钻颅抽吸治疗的疗效对比
引用本文:黄奇武,王争,戴携.基底节脑出血开颅手术与钻颅抽吸治疗的疗效对比[J].中国医药指南,2013(25):335-336.
作者姓名:黄奇武  王争  戴携
作者单位:长沙市第四医院,湖南长沙,410000
摘    要:目的探讨基底节脑出血开颅手术与钻颅抽吸治疗的效果对比。方法本次研究选择的对象共80例,对照组40例行开颅血肿清除术,观察组40例采用钻颅细吸术。结果两组GCS评分无明显差异,MESSS评分无明显差异,对照组死亡3例,占7.5%,对照组死亡4例,占10%,两组比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论基底节脑出血开颅手术与钻颅抽吸治疗效果无明显差别,临床需依据患者的病情对术式进行合理选择。

关 键 词:基底节脑出血  开颅手术  钻颅抽吸

Surgical Operation for Intracerebral Hemorrhage in the Basal Ganglia and Aspiration by Drilling Cranium Curative Effect Contrast
HAUNG Qi-wu , WANG Zheng , DAI Xie.Surgical Operation for Intracerebral Hemorrhage in the Basal Ganglia and Aspiration by Drilling Cranium Curative Effect Contrast[J].Guide of China Medicine,2013(25):335-336.
Authors:HAUNG Qi-wu  WANG Zheng  DAI Xie
Affiliation:(The Fourth Hospital of Changsha, Changsha 410000, China)
Abstract:Objective To investigate the surgical operation for intracerebral hemorrhage in the basal ganglia and aspiration by drilling cranium treatment effect comparison. Method The object of this study is to choose a total of 80 cases, the control group of 40 cases of craniotomy evacuation of hematoma, 40 cases of observation group with cranial drilling ifne aspiration. Results The two groups had no signiifcant difference in GCS scores, MESSS scores showed no difference in control group, 3 cases of death, accounting for 7.5%, control group 4 cases of death, accounting for 10%, no signiifcant difference between the two groups (P〉0.05). Conclusion There was no signiifcant difference between the surgical operation for intracerebral hemorrhage in the basal ganglia and aspiration by drilling cranium therapeutic effect, clinical should according to the patient's illness on operation for reasonable choice.
Keywords:Basal ganglia intracerebral hemorrhage  Surgical operation  Aspiration by drilling cranium
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号