首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

福州住宅应用土壤源热泵的全年能耗与可行性分析
引用本文:范亚明,李兴友,付祥钊.福州住宅应用土壤源热泵的全年能耗与可行性分析[J].土木建筑与环境工程,2007,29(1):93-95100.
作者姓名:范亚明  李兴友  付祥钊
作者单位:[1]福建工程学院,福州350007 [2]重庆大学城市建设与环境工程学院,重庆400045
基金项目:福建工程学院科研发展基金资助项目(GY-Z0304)
摘    要:以福州地区典型的单户住宅为实例,在全年逐时建筑负荷计算的基础上,进行空气源热泵和地源热泵的全年能耗分析,并在此基础上进行两者的经济性比较。结果表明,从全年能耗比较,土壤源热泵比空气源热泵节能15%,其中夏季节能13%;冬季节能20%。尽管土壤源热泵机组的季节性能比SE-ER高于空气源热泵,但由于福州冬季室外气温较温和,夏季地温偏高,土壤源热泵的节能效果不及夏热冬冷地区明显,并且初投资回收期较长,经济可行性较差。

关 键 词:土壤源热泵  空气源热泵  全年能耗  经济可行性
修稿时间:2006/4/25 0:00:00

Annual Energy Consumption and Feasibility Assessment of Ground -Source Heat Pump in Residential Building in Fuzhou City
FAN Ya - ming,LI Xing - you,FU Xiang - zhao.Annual Energy Consumption and Feasibility Assessment of Ground -Source Heat Pump in Residential Building in Fuzhou City[J].土木建筑与环境工程,2007,29(1):93-95100.
Authors:FAN Ya - ming  LI Xing - you  FU Xiang - zhao
Affiliation:1. Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350007, P. R. China; 2. Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, P. R. China
Abstract:This paper describes the annual energy consumption and economic assessment of air-source heat pump(ASHP) and ground-source heat pump(GSHP),based on hourly building load of typical house in Fuzhou.Analysis results show that the energy consumption of GSHP is 15% less than that of ASHP through all year,where there is 13% less in summer and 20% less in winter.Although the seasonal energy efficiency ratio of GSHP in Fuzhou is higher than that of ASHP,it has no obvious effect on the energy efficiency as it is in the hot summer and cold winter zone.In comparison with ASHP,the GSHP is not cost-effective.
Keywords:Ground - source heat pump  air - source heat pump  annual energy consumption  economical feasibility
点击此处可从《土木建筑与环境工程》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《土木建筑与环境工程》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号