首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

兰州市城关区中老年人群骨质疏松症三种诊断标准的检出率比较
引用本文:曾昭洋,胡文斌,魏学玲,张华,张本忠,王嘉图,梁恬,张兴璐.兰州市城关区中老年人群骨质疏松症三种诊断标准的检出率比较[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2017(5):652-656.
作者姓名:曾昭洋  胡文斌  魏学玲  张华  张本忠  王嘉图  梁恬  张兴璐
作者单位:1.甘肃中医药大学,甘肃 兰州 730000 2.兰州市城关区疾病控制中心,甘肃 兰州 730000 3.兰州大学公共卫生学院,甘肃 兰州 730000 4.甘肃中医药大学附属医院,甘肃 兰州 730000
基金项目:兰州市城关区科技计划项目(2012-1-3)
摘    要:目的比较骨质疏松症的国际卫生组织(WHO)诊断标准、中国老年学学会骨质疏松委员会(OCCGS)标准差诊断标准及骨量丢失百分率诊断标准在兰州市城关区中老年人群中应用的异同。方法采取多阶段整群分层随机抽样方法抽取城关区年龄在50岁以上的社区人员2500人进行问卷调查,分别应用WHO标准、OCCGS(标准差)标准与OCCGS(百分率)标准,比较原发性骨质疏松症(POP)的检出率及诊断的一致性。结果 WHO标准、OCCGS(标准差)标准和OCCGS(百分率)标准的POP检出率分别为13.89%、25.65%和45.32%。WHO标准与OCCGS(标准差)标准、WHO标准与OCCGS(百分率)标准以及OCCGS(标准差)标准与OCCGS(百分率)标准的检出POP一致率分别为13.89%、13.69%和25.44%。WHO标准和OCCGS(标准差)标准呈高度一致,OCCGS(标准差)标准和OCCGS(百分率)标准呈中度一致,WHO标准和OCCGS(百分率)标准呈低度一致。结论三种诊断标准在诊断POP上存在差异,建议对兰州市人群骨质疏松症的诊断采用OCCGS诊断标准。

关 键 词:兰州市  城关区  骨质疏松症  诊断标准

Comparison of the osteoporosis detection rate among three different diagnostic criteria in middle-aged and elderly people in Chengguan district of Lanzhou city
ZENG Zhaoyang,HU Wenbin,WEI Xueling,ZHANG Hu,ZHANG Benzhong,WANG Jiatu,LIANG Tian,ZHANG Xinglu.Comparison of the osteoporosis detection rate among three different diagnostic criteria in middle-aged and elderly people in Chengguan district of Lanzhou city[J].Chinese Journal of Osteoporosis,2017(5):652-656.
Authors:ZENG Zhaoyang  HU Wenbin  WEI Xueling  ZHANG Hu  ZHANG Benzhong  WANG Jiatu  LIANG Tian  ZHANG Xinglu
Affiliation:1.Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000,China 2.The Center for Disease Control, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730000,China 3.School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000,China 4.The Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, China
Abstract:Objective To compare the similarities and differences of diagnosis of osteoporosis among the World Health Organization (WHO) standard, Osteoporosis Committee of China Gerontological Society criteria, and bone loss percentage diagnostic standard in the middle-aged and elderly people in Chengguan district of Lanzhou city. Methods Two thousand and five hundred community members who were over 50 years old were extracted by stratified cluster random sampling method and conducted a questionnaire survey. The detection rate and diagnostic consistency of osteoporosis were compared using WHO criteria, OCCGS (SD) criteria, and OCCGS (percentage) criteria. Results The detection rate of osteoporosis was 13.89% with WHO criteria, 25.65% with OCCGS (SD) criteria, and 45.32% with OCCGS (percentage) criteria, respectively. The consistency between WHO criteria and OCCGS (SD) criteria, WHO criteria and OCCGS (percentage) criteria, and OCCGS (SD) criteria and OCCGS (percentage) criteria was 13.89%, 13.69%, and 25.44%, respectively. WHO criteria and OCCGS (SD) criteria was highly consistent. OCCGS (SD) criteria and OCCGS (percentage) criteria was moderately consistent. WHO criteria and OCCGS (percentage) criteria was lowly consistent. Conclusion There are differences among the three diagnostic criteria in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. OCCGS diagnostic criteria are more suitable for Lanzhou population.
Keywords:Lanzhou city  Chengguan district  Osteoporosis  Diagnostic criteria
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国骨质疏松杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国骨质疏松杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号