首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

静脉内和冠脉内同时应用替罗非班在急性心肌梗死介入治疗中的疗效与安全性
引用本文:陆传新,郑兴,秦永文,赵仙先,徐荣良,章建梁,吴弘,游晓华,黄新苗,李松华,宗刚军,张必利.静脉内和冠脉内同时应用替罗非班在急性心肌梗死介入治疗中的疗效与安全性[J].第二军医大学学报,2009,30(2):178-182.
作者姓名:陆传新  郑兴  秦永文  赵仙先  徐荣良  章建梁  吴弘  游晓华  黄新苗  李松华  宗刚军  张必利
作者单位:第二军医大学长海医院心血管内科,上海,200433
基金项目:上海市科学技术委员会资助课题(064119502).
摘    要:目的:评价静脉内和冠脉内同时应用负荷剂量替罗非班在急性ST段抬高心肌梗死(STEMI)患者急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中的疗效和安全性。方法:43例拟行急诊PCI术STEMI患者随机选入替罗非班IV组(仅静脉内推注负荷剂量替罗非班,22例)和替罗非班IV&IC组(静脉内和冠脉内同时推注负荷剂量替罗非班,21例),观察患者PCI术前术后thrombolysis in myocardial infarction trial(TIMI)血流分级和心肌组织灌注,住院期间心脏超声、主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、出血事件和血小板减少,以及术后30 d的MACE。结果:两组患者的基础临床情况和术前冠脉造影特征差异无统计学意义;两组患者术后TIMI 血流分级,校正的TIMI帧数计数(CTFC)≤27帧差异无统计学意义;术后心电图ST段抬高总和回落(sumSTR)百分比≥70%,肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)与肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)峰值浓度等差异无统计学意义;住院期间左室收缩功能、MACE、大量出血事件、血小板减少症的发生率等差异无统计学意义;两组术后30 d MACE发生率差异无统计学意义。结论:在STEMI患者急诊PCI术中,静脉内和冠脉内同时应用负荷剂量替罗非班是安全的,近期疗效与单纯静脉内应用替罗非班相当。

关 键 词:心肌梗死  经皮冠状动脉介入治疗  替罗非班  静脉内给药  冠状动脉给药
收稿时间:2008/4/17 0:00:00
修稿时间:2008/12/12 0:00:00

Efficacy and safety of intravenous combined with intracoronary administration of tirofiban bolus in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
LU Chuan-xin,ZHENG Xing,QIN Yong-wen,ZHAO Xian-xian,XU Rong-liang,ZHANG Jian-liang,WU Hong,YOU Xiao-hu,HUANG Xin-miao,LI Song-hu,ZONG Gang-jun,ZHAN.Efficacy and safety of intravenous combined with intracoronary administration of tirofiban bolus in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University,2009,30(2):178-182.
Authors:LU Chuan-xin  ZHENG Xing  QIN Yong-wen  ZHAO Xian-xian  XU Rong-liang  ZHANG Jian-liang  WU Hong  YOU Xiao-hu  HUANG Xin-miao  LI Song-hu  ZONG Gang-jun  ZHAN
Affiliation:Department of Cardiovasology,Changhai Hospital,Second Military Medical University,Shanghai 200433,China
Abstract:Objective:To assess the safety and efficacy of simultaneous intravenous plus intracoronary administration of tirofiban bolus for patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods:Forty-three patients with acute STEMI ready to receive primary PCI were randomly divided into tirofiban IV group (intravenous tirofiban bolus only before stent deployment,n=22) or tirofiban IV&IC group (intravenous plus intracoronary administration of t...
Keywords:myocardial infarction  percutaneous coronary intervention  tirofiban  intravenous administration  intracoronary administration
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《第二军医大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《第二军医大学学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号