首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

2013—2014年南京中医药大学附属医院丹红注射液临床用药合理性分析
引用本文:张倩,居文政,郭建明,李建萍,谭喜莹,王晓骁,赵步长,唐志书,段金廒.2013—2014年南京中医药大学附属医院丹红注射液临床用药合理性分析[J].中国中药杂志,2016,41(4):748-754.
作者姓名:张倩  居文政  郭建明  李建萍  谭喜莹  王晓骁  赵步长  唐志书  段金廒
作者单位:南京中医药大学附属医院, 江苏 南京 210029;南京中医药大学 江苏省中药资源产业化过程协同创新中心, 江苏省方剂高技术研究重点实验室, 江苏 南京 210023,南京中医药大学附属医院, 江苏 南京 210029,南京中医药大学 江苏省中药资源产业化过程协同创新中心, 江苏省方剂高技术研究重点实验室, 江苏 南京 210023,南京中医药大学 江苏省中药资源产业化过程协同创新中心, 江苏省方剂高技术研究重点实验室, 江苏 南京 210023,南京中医药大学附属医院, 江苏 南京 210029,南京中医药大学附属医院, 江苏 南京 210029,菏泽步长制药有限公司, 陕西 西安 710000,陕西中医药大学, 陕西 咸阳 712000,南京中医药大学 江苏省中药资源产业化过程协同创新中心, 江苏省方剂高技术研究重点实验室, 江苏 南京 210023
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(2011CB505300);国家"重大新药创制"科技重大专项(2015ZX09501004001006);江苏省高校自然科学研究重大项目(14KJA360001);江苏省中药资源产业化过程协同创新中心重点项目(ZDXM-2-2);江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目(KYLX_0968);江苏省高等学校大学生创新创业训练计划省级项目(201510315064Y)
摘    要:临床用药的合理性分析是考察影响中药注射剂临床效益与风险相关因素的必要研究。该研究基于南京中医药大学附属医院信息系统(HIS)数据库,选取2013年1月—2014年12月使用丹红注射液的4 950例患者的病案与医嘱信息,运用回顾性研究、基本统计和关联规则分析方法,统计分析患者自然情况、疾病诊断、应用科室、用法用量、联合用药和不良反应等信息,对丹红注射液的临床应用进行合理性分析,寻找发生不良反应的相关因素。研究结果显示,患者主要分布在心内科(51.96%)与脑病中心(20.67%),年龄40岁以上占96.66%,主要西医诊断2项关联置信度最高为冠心病+心绞痛(97.15%),3项关联为冠心病+心绞痛+高血压(97.02%),不合理诊断主要为高血压(12.93%)和糖尿病(4.55%);中医诊断均属血瘀证。用法用量方面,单次剂量在药品说明书规定范围内者占98.93%,用药天数集中分布在1~21 d,以0.9%氯化钠注射液和5%葡萄糖注射液为稀释溶媒的占97.64%。用药记录中,99.26%为联合用药,平均联用8.41种药物。与西药联用频次最高的依次是抗血小板药(72.04%)、调血脂药(64.86%)和脑血管疾病药(60.26%)。出现并发感染时,联用频次最高的抗菌药物为头孢菌素类(8.81%)。与中药联用以活血化瘀类中药注射剂或中药单体注射剂为主(28.93%),其中与天麻素注射液联用频次最高(16.23%)。不良反应报告/事件发生12例,发生率0.24%。适应症、稀释溶媒与联合用药的不合理应用可能是丹红注射液发生不良反应的潜在风险因素,需进一步实验研究评价这3方面的临床效益与风险。

关 键 词:丹红注射液  临床用药  合理性分析  配伍溶媒  联合用药
收稿时间:2015/10/7 0:00:00

Rationality analysis of clinical application of Danhong injection in affiliated hospital of Nanjing university of Chinese medicine from 2013 to 2014
ZHANG Qian,JU Wen-zheng,GUO Jian-ming,LI Jian-ping,TAN Xi-ying,WANG Xiao-xiao,ZHAO Bu-chang,TANG Zhi-shu and DUAN Jin-ao.Rationality analysis of clinical application of Danhong injection in affiliated hospital of Nanjing university of Chinese medicine from 2013 to 2014[J].China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica,2016,41(4):748-754.
Authors:ZHANG Qian  JU Wen-zheng  GUO Jian-ming  LI Jian-ping  TAN Xi-ying  WANG Xiao-xiao  ZHAO Bu-chang  TANG Zhi-shu and DUAN Jin-ao
Affiliation:The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China;Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Chinese Medicinal Resources Industrialization, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for High Technology Research of Traditional Chinese Medicine Formulae, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China,The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China,Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Chinese Medicinal Resources Industrialization, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for High Technology Research of Traditional Chinese Medicine Formulae, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China,Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Chinese Medicinal Resources Industrialization, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for High Technology Research of Traditional Chinese Medicine Formulae, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China,The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China,The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China,Heze Buchang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710000, China,Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang 712000, China and Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Chinese Medicinal Resources Industrialization, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for High Technology Research of Traditional Chinese Medicine Formulae, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China
Abstract:It is necessary to investigate the influence of the rationality of clinical drug use on the benefit and risk factors of traditional Chinese medicine injections. The retrospective survey was based on the medical records and information of 4 950 patients who used Danhong injection in the HIS database of the first affiliated hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine from 2013 to 2014. The basic statistical methods and associated rules analysis were utilized to analyze the HIS information of these patients, including the basic information, the diagnosis, the department, the dosage, the usage of medication, the drug combination and the adverse reactions. And the rationality analysis of the clinical application of Danhong injection was carried out to investigate relevant factors of the adverse reactions. The results showed that most cases came from the department of cardiology (51.95%) and encephalopathy center (20.67%). In the statistical period, the patients aged above 40 years old accounted for 96.65%. And the two western medicine diagnosis items with the highest confidence level were coronary heart disease and angina pectoris (97.15%), while the three items were coronary heart disease, angina pectoris and hypertension (97.02%). The irrational indications were mainly hypertension (12.93%) and diabetes (4.55%). All of them were diagnosed as blood stasis syndrome by the traditional Chinese medicine. About 98.93% of the single dosage was within the range stipulated on package insert, the duration mainly ranged between 1 and 21 days, and 97.64% of the menstrua contained 0.9% NS and 5% GS. According to the medication records, 99.26% were the use of combined drugs, with 8.41 drugs on average. Antiplatelet drugs (72.04%) were the most frequently combined with western medicine, followed by the cholesterol-regulating drugs (64.86%) and the cerebrovascular drugs (60.26%). When used in the combination with antibiotics for the infection, cephalosporin antibiotics were the most frequently applied (8.81%). When used with traditional Chinese medicines, traditional Chinese medicines for activating blood circulation and removing blood stasis or monomer traditional Chinese medicine injections (28.93%) were the dominance, in which Gastrodin injection was the most frequently applied (16.23%). And 12 cases of adverse reactions were reported, with the ADR rate of 0.24%. The indications, solvent compatibility and irrational drug combination may be the potential risk factors for ADRs induced by Danhong injection. Further experiments are required to evaluate the benefits and risks in these three aspects.
Keywords:Danhong injection  clinical application  rationality analysis  menstruum  drug combination
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号