|
|||||
|
|
| 三种验潮方法水位观测性能比较与统计分析 | |
| 引用本文： | 肖付民,赵江,陈日高,夏伟.三种验潮方法水位观测性能比较与统计分析[J].海洋测绘,2009,29(3):24-27. |
| 作者姓名： | 肖付民 赵江 陈日高 夏伟 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 海军大连舰艇学院,海测工程系,辽宁,大连,116018 2. 92303部队,山东,胶南,266405 3. 92493部队,辽宁,葫芦岛,125000 |
| 摘 要： | 水尺、压力式验潮仪与验潮井验潮仪是海道测量水位控制和水位观测的主要手段。通过6日6个时间段的同步比对试验，计算了三种方法获取水位观测数据之间的潮时差和潮高差，分析了三种观测手段的水位观测性能以及产生差值的可能原因，提出了使用方法的建议。 |
| 关 键 词： | 水位观测 同步比对 潮时差 潮高差 |
Comparison of Water-level Observation Performance Among Three Tidal Methods and Statistical Analysis |
|
| XIAO Fu-min,ZHAO Jiang,CHEN Ri-gao,XIA Wei.Comparison of Water-level Observation Performance Among Three Tidal Methods and Statistical Analysis[J].Hydrographic Surveying and Charting,2009,29(3):24-27. | |
| Authors: | XIAO Fu-min ZHAO Jiang CHEN Ri-gao XIA Wei |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Hydrography and Cartography, Dalian Naval Academy, Dalian, Liaoning, 116018 ; 2. 92303 Troops, Jiaonan, Shandong, 266405 ;3. 92493 Troops, Huludao, Liaoning, 125000) |
| Abstract: | Tide staff, pressure gauge and stilling-well gauge are three important types of instruments for water-level control and water-level observation in hydrographic field. Tests of synchronous comparison in six time sections in six days are carried out. The tidal time differences and tidal height differences among three series of acquired data are calculated. The capability of water-level observation of three instruments and the potential reasons of those differences are analyzed in the paper. Finally, the advice of using those instruments in field is put forward. |
| Keywords: | water-level observation synchronous comparison tidal time difference tidal height difference |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |
| 点击此处可从《海洋测绘》浏览原始摘要信息 | |
| 点击此处可从《海洋测绘》下载全文 | |
