首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

EMA-qPCR检测活沙门菌方法研究
引用本文:鞠长燕,闻子钰,段永翔,顾一心,梁昊,马艳萍,张茂俊.EMA-qPCR检测活沙门菌方法研究[J].中国热带医学,2020,20(3):219-222.
作者姓名:鞠长燕  闻子钰  段永翔  顾一心  梁昊  马艳萍  张茂俊
作者单位:1.深圳市南山区疾病预防控制中心,广东 深圳 518051;2.中国疾病预防控制中心传染病预防控制所,北京 102206;3.中山大学公共卫生学院,广东 广州 510030
基金项目:深圳市“医疗卫生三名工程”引进高层次医学团队项目(No.SZSM201803081); 深圳市科技创新委员会项目(No.JCYJ20160427110027326); 深圳市南山区重点学科建设资助
摘    要:目的 为解决荧光定量PCR(qPCR)方法不能区分死菌和活菌的问题,探索一种快速定量检测“活的”沙门菌的技术路线。方法 将不同浓度叠氮溴化乙锭(EMA)作用于不同浓度的死/活沙门菌后,用qPCR检测沙门菌Ct值,确定EMA的最优使用浓度。在混合菌量为106、105、104、103 CFU/mL,活菌比例为0%、10%、30%、50%、70%、100%条件下,确定EMA处理过的活菌+死菌,未加EMA的活菌+死菌,未加EMA的活菌+生理盐水三组菌的Ct值,研究EMA-qPCR法对死/活沙门菌的区分能力。结果 EMA浓度低于50 μg/mL,EMA处理活菌组与EMA未处理活菌组的Ct值差异无统计学意义。综合考虑,EMA最优使用浓度为10 μg/mL。采用10 μg/mL EMA进行预处理,混合菌量为106、105、104、103 CFU/mL时得出的结果一致:活菌比例为0%,≤50%,>50%时,EMA处理过的活菌+死菌与未加EMA的活菌+死菌两组Ct值差异(ΔCt)分别为≥5,≥1,<1。同时,除活菌比例0%外,其他活菌浓度下,EMA处理过的活菌+死菌与未加EMA的活菌+生理盐水两组Ct值无明显差异。结论 菌量为103~106 CFU/mL时,通过10 μg/mLEMA作用,EMA处理过样品与未加EMA处理样品的ΔCt值≥1,可考虑样品中沙门菌活菌比例≤50%。

关 键 词:叠氮溴化乙锭(EMA)  EMA最优使用浓度  荧光定量PCR(qPCR)  Ct值  沙门菌  
收稿时间:2019-08-22

EMA real-time PCR method for detection of alive Salmonella
JU Changyan,WEN Ziyu,DUAN Yongxiang,GU Yixin,LIANG Hao,MA Yanping,ZHANG Maojun.EMA real-time PCR method for detection of alive Salmonella[J].China Tropical Medicine,2020,20(3):219-222.
Authors:JU Changyan  WEN Ziyu  DUAN Yongxiang  GU Yixin  LIANG Hao  MA Yanping  ZHANG Maojun
Affiliation:1.Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518051, China;2. National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China;3. School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University,Guangzhou, Guangdong 510030, China
Abstract:Objective To probe into the problem of dead bacteria and alive bacteria couldn't be distinguished by fluorescence quantitative PCR (qPCR), a rapid quantitative detection method for alive Salmonella was explored. Methods Different concentrations of dead/alive Salmonella were pretreated with different concentrations of ethidiummonoazide (EMA), the Ct value of Salmonella was detected by qPCR, and the optimal concentration of EMA was determined. In the concentration of 106,105,104,103 CFU/mL and alive bacteria proportion of 0%, 10%, 30%, 50%, 70% and 100%, the Ct values of three groups, alive +dead bacteria (EMA treatment), alive+dead bacteria (without EMA), alive bacteria+ saline (without EMA), were determined to distinguish the dead and alive salmonella byEMA-qPCR. Results There was no significant difference in Ct value between EMA treated alive Samonella group and EMA untreated alive Samonella group when the EMA concentration was below 50 μg/mL. The optimal concentration of EMA was 10 μg/mL. The results of pretreatment with 10 μg/mL EMA were consistent in the concentration of 106,105,104,103 CFU/mL. When the proportion of alive Samonella was 0%, ≤50%,>50%, the difference of Ct value (ΔCt) was ≥5,≥1,<1between alive + dead bacteria (EMA treatment) and alive + dead bacteria (without EMA). Except alive bacteria proportion of 0%, there was no significant difference in Ct value between the alive + dead bacteria (EMA treatment) and alive bacteria + saline (without EMA) group. Conclusion In the concentration of 103-106 CFU/mL, with the pretreatment of 10 μg/mL EMA, the ratio of alive Salmonella was probably below 50% when the ΔCt≥1 between EMA treated sample and EMA untreated sample.
Keywords:Ethidiummonoazide  the optimal concentration of EMA  real-time PCR (qPCR)  Ct value  Salmonella  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国热带医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国热带医学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号