首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

一个求图的连通分支的并行算法
引用本文:唐策善,梁维发.一个求图的连通分支的并行算法[J].软件学报,1993,4(4):61-66.
作者姓名:唐策善  梁维发
作者单位:中国科技大学计算机系 合肥 230027;中国科技大学计算机系 合肥 230027
摘    要:已知一个无向图G(V,E),|V|=n,|E|=m,本文基于SIMD共享存贮模型,运用数据在图中快速传播原理,建议了一个新的求图的连通分支算法,具体来讲,在SIMD—CREW共享存贮模型上,求图的连通分支需O(log2n)时间、O(n2/logn)处理器;而在SIMD—CRCW共享存贮模型上需O(logn)时间、O(n2)处理器,建议的算法同著名的Hirschberg算法相比,其主要差别表现在:1)采用的求解方法不同;2)建议的算法简单易懂

关 键 词:求图  连通分支  并行算法
收稿时间:1990/7/20 0:00:00
修稿时间:1991/5/10 0:00:00

A PARALLEL ALGORITHM FOR COMPUTING CONNECTED COMPONENTS OF GRAPHS
Tang Ceshan and Liang Weifa.A PARALLEL ALGORITHM FOR COMPUTING CONNECTED COMPONENTS OF GRAPHS[J].Journal of Software,1993,4(4):61-66.
Authors:Tang Ceshan and Liang Weifa
Abstract:Given an undirected graph G(V,E), |V|=n,|E|=m. Based on SIMD shared memory model, a new parallel algorithm for computing connected components of graphs is proposed by using fast data transmission principle. As a result, the algorithm requires O(log2n) time and O(n2/logn) processors on SIMD-CREW shared memory model. But on SIMD-CRCW shared memory model, the algorithm only requires O (logn) time and O(n2) processors. To compare our algorithm with known Hirschberg s algorithm, there exists some differences. The major differences are identified as:1)the way to solve this problem is different;2)proposed algorithm is simple and easy to understan;3)proposed algorithm's implementation on some practical networks such as mesh-of-rtee has better time complexity.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《软件学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《软件学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号