首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

脑白质疏松轻度认知障碍患者认知损害特点分析
引用本文:金香兰,郑硕,张允岭,侯小兵,陈宝鑫,张艳霞,南一楠,牛焕敏,何婷婷,高芳,郭蓉娟,陈志刚,白文,戴中,柳洪胜.脑白质疏松轻度认知障碍患者认知损害特点分析[J].中国卒中杂志,2011,6(7):539-542.
作者姓名:金香兰  郑硕  张允岭  侯小兵  陈宝鑫  张艳霞  南一楠  牛焕敏  何婷婷  高芳  郭蓉娟  陈志刚  白文  戴中  柳洪胜
作者单位:1.北京市北京中医药大学东方医院2中国中医科学院望京医院3北京大学人民医院
基金项目:首都医学发展科研基金联合攻关资助项目,北京市新医药学科群建设资助项目,211工程重点学科建设资助项目2008年中医药行业科研资助专项
摘    要:目的 探讨脑白质疏松轻度认知障碍(leukoaraiosis mild cognitive impairmen,LACI)的认知损害特点,为临床诊治提供参考。方法 纳入LACI组77例及脑白质疏松(leukoaraiosis,LA)且无认知障碍组(对照组)74例进行蒙特利尔认知评估(Montreal cognitive assessment,MoCA)量表等心理量表检测。结果 LACI组MoCA量表总分为20.84±3.04分,对照组27.38±1.25分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);LACI组在MoCA量表的亚项-视空间与执行、命名能力、注意力、语言能力、抽象能力、延迟记忆能力、定向力等7个认知域的得分均较对照组低(P <0.01),MoCA总分与各亚项得分进行相关分析,除命名及语言能力2个亚项外,其他5个亚项均与总分有正相关关系,按相关系数的高低排序,依次为视空间与执行功能、延迟记忆、注意力、抽象能力、定向力。结论 LACI患者在视空间与执行、命名能力、注意力、语言能力、抽象能力、延迟记忆能力、定向力等认知域有不同程度的损害,其中视空间与执行功能、延迟记忆、注意力、抽象能力、定向力损害可能是早期损害较为明显的认知域,且在记忆过程中的编码、存储、提取这3个关键环节可能都存在损害。

关 键 词:脑白质疏松症  认知障碍  神经心理学测验  
收稿时间:2010-10-30

Characteristic Anylisis of Cognitive Impairment of Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients with Leukoaraiosis
JIN Xiang-Lan,ZHENG Shuo,ZHANG Yun-Ling,HOU Xiao-Bing,CHEN Bao-Xin,ZHANG Yan-Xia,NAN Yi-Nan,NIU Huan-Min,HE Ting-Ting,GAO-Fang,GUO Rong-Juan,CHEN Zhi-Gang,BAI Wen,DAI Zhong,LIU Hong-Sheng.Characteristic Anylisis of Cognitive Impairment of Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients with Leukoaraiosis[J].Chinese Journal of Stroke,2011,6(7):539-542.
Authors:JIN Xiang-Lan  ZHENG Shuo  ZHANG Yun-Ling  HOU Xiao-Bing  CHEN Bao-Xin  ZHANG Yan-Xia  NAN Yi-Nan  NIU Huan-Min  HE Ting-Ting  GAO-Fang  GUO Rong-Juan  CHEN Zhi-Gang  BAI Wen  DAI Zhong  LIU Hong-Sheng
Affiliation:. Dongfang Hospital, Beoing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100078, China
Abstract:Objective To explore mild cognitive impairment with impairment characteristics of leukoaraiosis(LACI), and to provide the reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods Seventy-seven patients with LACI and 74 leukoaraiosis(LA) patients without cognitive impairment(control group) were tested by Montreal cognitive assessment(MoCA) scale and other psychological scales. Results The total score of MoCA(20.84±3.04) in LACI group was lower than that in the control group(27.38 ± 1.25)(P〈 0.01).There was significant difference between the two groups in the space and execution, depending on-named ability, attentions language ability, abstract ability, delayed memory ability and directional power of seven cognitive domains(P〈0.01). The correlation analysis between the total score of the MoCA scores and secondary types showed that except for the naming and language ability, there was a positive correlation between the other five secondary types and the total scores, according to high-and-low ranking in the correlation coefficient, which in turn depends on the space and executive function for delay, memory, attention, abstract ability, directional power. Conclusion LACI patients have different damage levels on visual space, execution, named ability, attention, language ability, abstract ability, delayed memory ability, directional power and some other cognitive domains, and visual space and executive function, delayed memory, attention, abstract, directional power ability may be obvious cognitive domains in the earlier damage, the three key link in the process of memory such as encoding, storage, extraction have existed in the damage.
Keywords:Leukoraiosis  Cognition disorders  Neuropsychological tests
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国卒中杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国卒中杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号