首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

血清NSE、ProGRP、CEA、SCCA和CYFRA21-1联检在肺癌诊断中的意义
引用本文:金霞霞,陈世勇,齐娟飞,郭峰,许成新. 血清NSE、ProGRP、CEA、SCCA和CYFRA21-1联检在肺癌诊断中的意义[J]. 放射免疫学杂志, 2012, 25(1): 83-86
作者姓名:金霞霞  陈世勇  齐娟飞  郭峰  许成新
作者单位:浙江省台州医院检验科,317000
摘    要:目的:探讨胃泌素释放肽前体(progastrin-releasing peptide,ProGRP)、神经特异性烯醇化酶(neuronspecific enolase,NSE)、癌胚抗原(carcino-embryonic antigen,CEA)、鳞状细胞癌抗原(squamous cell carcinomaantigen,SCCA)及细胞角蛋白19(CYFRA21-1)在肺癌诊断中的价值和临床意义。方法:分别采用化学发光法或电化学发光法检测14例肺部良性疾病、12例小细胞肺癌、29例非小细胞肺癌患者血清ProGRP、NSE、CEA、SCCA、CYFRA21-1含量。结果:NSE、ProGRP对SCLC诊断的敏感性分别为66.7%、83.3%,且NSE与ProGRP具有很好的相关性,CYFRA21-1对鳞癌诊断的敏感性为63.6%,CEA对腺癌诊断的敏感性为64.3%。SCLC组ProGRP、NSE水平均显著高于NSCLC组、肺良性疾病组,差异有统计学意义。NSCLC组,CYFRA21-1水平显著高于其余两组,差异有统计学意义。ProGRP、NSE联检对SCLC的检出率可达91.7%,CYFRA21-1、SCCA、CEA联检对腺癌、鳞癌的检出率分别为71.4%、72.7%。结论:ProGRP及ProGRP+NSE是SCLC诊断的较好指标,CYFRA21-1、CEA分别对鳞癌、腺癌具有一定的诊断价值。

关 键 词:肺癌诊断  胃泌素释放肽前体  神经特异性烯醇化酶  癌胚抗原  鳞状细胞癌抗原  细胞角蛋白19

Diagnostic Significance of Combined Deteceion on Serum ProGRP, NSE,CEA, SCCA and CYFRA21 -1 in Patients with Lung Cancer
Jin Xia-xia,Chen Shi-yong,Qi Juan-fei,Guo Feng,Xiu Chen-xing. Diagnostic Significance of Combined Deteceion on Serum ProGRP, NSE,CEA, SCCA and CYFRA21 -1 in Patients with Lung Cancer[J]. Journal of Radioimmanology, 2012, 25(1): 83-86
Authors:Jin Xia-xia  Chen Shi-yong  Qi Juan-fei  Guo Feng  Xiu Chen-xing
Affiliation:Jin Xia-xia,Chen Shi-yong,Qi Juan-fei,Guo Feng,Xiu Chen-xing Department of Laboratory, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou( 317000), China
Abstract:Objective To study the value of serum progastrin-releasing peptide ( ProGRP), neuron specific enolase ( NSE), carcino-embryonic antigen(CEA), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) and cell keratin 19 segment (CYFRA21-1) in lung cancer diagnosis. Methods The serum levels of ProGRP, NSE, CEA, SCCA and CYFRA21-1 were detected in 14 patients with benign lung diseases, 12 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 29 patients with non- small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by using chemiluminescence immunoassay(CLIA) or electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) respectively. Results The sensitivity of ProGRP, NSE for diagnosing SCLC were 66.7%, 83.3%, while CYFRA21-1 for diagnosing squamous carcinoma, CEA for diagnosing adenocarcinoma were 63.6% ,64.3% separately. The levels of ProGRP,NSE in the SCLC were apparently higher than NSCLC and benign lung diseases, the differences were statistical significant, while the level of CYFRA21-1 in the NSCLC was evidently higher than the other two groups, the differences were statistical significant. The positive rates of combined measurement of ProGRP and NSE in SCLC was 91.7%. And the positive rates of combined measurement of serum CYFRA21-1, SCCA and CEA in adenocarcinoma, squa- mous carcinoma were 71.4% ,72.7% individually. Conclusion ProGRP and ProGRP + NSE were useful indicators for diagnosing SCLC, CYFRA21-1, CEA were valuable parameter for diagnosing adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma respectively.
Keywords:lung cancer diagnosis   ProGRP   NSE   CEA   SCCA   CYFRA21-1
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号