Abstract: | Objective To explore the clinical value of nucleic acid testing and antibody testing in the diagnosis of AIDS.Methods The complete clinical data of 100 AIDS patients collected in our city from April 2017 to April 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.All 100 patients received antibody testing and nucleic acid testing.The diagnostic coincidence rate and sensitivity of nucleic acid testing and antibody testing in the early and middle stages of patients with advanced HIV infection have been compared and analyzed.Results The diagnostic coincidence rate(93.33%) of early HIV-infected patients with nucleic acid testing was higher than that of antibody testing(75.00%).The diagnostic coincidence rate(97.50%) of the middle and advanced HIV-infected patients with antibody testing was higher than that of nucleic acid testing(75.00%).The sensitivity(96.55%) of nucleic acid testing in diagnosing early HIV infection was higher than that of antibody testing(80.36%).The sensitivity of antibody testing in diagnosing middle and advance HIV infectio(88.64%) was higher than that(71.43%) of nucleic acid testing(P<0.05).Conclusion In the early diagnosis of AIDS infection,the accuracy and sensitivity of nucleic acid detection in early HIV infection are high,while in the diagnosis of the middle and advanced AIDS infection,the accuracy and sensitivity of antibody detection are both high.Therefore,nucleic acid testing and antibody testing have their own advantages.Clinicians should choose appropriate testing methods based on actual conditions.If necessary,the two can be tried to combine further improve the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of clinical testing for HIV infection.If necessary,try to combine the two to further improve the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of clinical detection of HIV infection,help physicians diagnose AIDS as soon as possible,and give patients corresponding antiviral treatment early. |