首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

中心护栏对行人交通流的影响研究
引用本文:白克钊,蔡美静,许志鹏,邝华.中心护栏对行人交通流的影响研究[J].广西科学,2015,22(4):368-372.
作者姓名:白克钊  蔡美静  许志鹏  邝华
作者单位:广西师范大学物理科学与技术学院, 广西桂林 541004,广西师范大学物理科学与技术学院, 广西桂林 541004,广西师范大学物理科学与技术学院, 广西桂林 541004,广西师范大学物理科学与技术学院, 广西桂林 541004
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(11262005),广西自然科学基金项目(2014GXNSFAA118007),广西高校科研一般项目(YB2014034)和广西研究生教育创新项目(YCSZ2015089)资助。
摘    要:【目的】研究不同博弈行为、中心分隔护栏的长度和位置布局对行人流动力学的影响。【方法】考虑行人运动过程中的心理变化,引入博弈和学习策略,用以刻画行人在面对位置冲突时所采取的决策行为,分别建立相应的单向和相向行人流格子气模型。【结果】在单向行人流中,中心护栏长度对行人流无影响;而在相向行人流中,中心护栏的长度和位置布局对行人运动效率具有明显的影响。【结论】在单向行人流的通道中设置中心护栏不会影响行人流的宏观特性,也不会提高行人的整体运动效率;而在相向行人流的通道中,设置中心护栏可以提高行人运动效率,且设置有空隙的两个中心护栏比设置无空隙的单一中心护栏更能提高行人的整体移动效率。

关 键 词:行人流  中心护栏  格子气模型  博弈心理
收稿时间:2015/5/10 0:00:00
修稿时间:2015/5/18 0:00:00

Effect of Central Barrier on Pedestrian Traffic Flow
BAI Ke-zhao,CAI Mei-jing,XU Zhi-peng and KUANG Hua.Effect of Central Barrier on Pedestrian Traffic Flow[J].Guangxi Sciences,2015,22(4):368-372.
Authors:BAI Ke-zhao  CAI Mei-jing  XU Zhi-peng and KUANG Hua
Affiliation:College of Physical Science and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi, 541004, China,College of Physical Science and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi, 541004, China,College of Physical Science and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi, 541004, China and College of Physical Science and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi, 541004, China
Abstract:Objective] Considering the psychological changes of pedestrian, the game behaviors and learning strategies are introduced to describe decision-making behavior of pedestrians when they meet location conflicts.Methods] The corresponding unidirectional and bidirectional pedestrian flow lattice gas models are established to simulate pedestrian movement, respectively. The influences of different game behaviors, the length and position of central barrier on pedestrian flow are studied via numerical simulation.Results] The length of central barrier has almost no effect on the movement efficiency of the unidirectional pedestrian flow. However, it has an obvious influence on the bidirectional pedestrian flow. Conclusion] The central barrier has no effect on the unidirectional pedestrian flow, but it can improve movement efficiency on the bidirectional pedestrian flow. In addition, two central barriers are more effective to improve the total movement efficiency of pedestrian flow than that of one central barrier.
Keywords:pedestrian flow  central barrier  lattice gas model  game psychology
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《广西科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《广西科学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号