| 浅析三个管线钢管标准中(埋弧焊部分)无损检测要求的异同 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 丹红兵.浅析三个管线钢管标准中(埋弧焊部分)无损检测要求的异同[J].钢管,2003,32(5):41-44. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 丹红兵 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 番禺珠江钢管有限公司,广东,广州,511450 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对管线钢管常用的3个标准APISpec5L-2000、GB/T9711.1-1997、GB/T9711.2-1999(埋弧焊部分)的无损检测项目进行了分析比较,以期对钢管的生产、检验、订货提供指导。前两个标准的主要区别在于对管端剩磁的检验,GB/T9711.2与前两者最大的区别在于加强了对分层缺陷的检测要求,对超声波检测和射线检测的要求也更详细具体。
|
| 关 键 词： | 管线钢管标准 埋弧焊 无损检测 超声波检测 射线检测 分析比较 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-2311(2003)05-0041-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002年9月18日 |
Discussion on Similarity and Difference in NDT Requirements Between Three Steel Linepipe Standards (SAW Parts) |
| |
| Dan Hongbin.Discussion on Similarity and Difference in NDT Requirements Between Three Steel Linepipe Standards (SAW Parts)[J].Steel Pipe,2003,32(5):41-44. |
| |
| Authors: | Dan Hongbin |
| |
| Abstract: | Analyzed and compared are the NDT items between the three commonly-used steel linepipe standards namely,API Spec.5L-2000,GB/T9711.1-1997and GB/T9711.2-1999(SAW parts)in a bid to guide production,inspection and purchase of steel tubular products.The major difference between the first two standards lies in the inspections for the tube end residual magnetism,while the major difference between GB/T9711.2and the said two standards is that for GB/T9711.2the inspection requirements for lamination are more stringent and the requirements concerning UT and radiation detections are more detailed and more specific. |
| |
| Keywords: | Steel linepipestandard SAW NDT UTdetection Radiationdetection Analysisandcomparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
