首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

激光粒度分析和筛分法测粒径分布的比较
引用本文:李文凯,吴玉新,黄志民,樊融,吕俊复.激光粒度分析和筛分法测粒径分布的比较[J].中国粉体技术,2007,13(5):10-13.
作者姓名:李文凯  吴玉新  黄志民  樊融  吕俊复
作者单位:清华大学,热科学与动力工程教育部重点实验室,北京,100084
摘    要:分别采用筛分法和马尔文激光粒度分析仪两种方法对16种颗粒的粒径分布进行了测量。通过比较,发现两种测量手段得到的粒径分布结果存在较大的差异,马尔文激光粒度方法对颗粒粒径的测量结果偏小,受颗粒形状的影响很大;筛分法对微细颗粒的测量误差较大,但对大粒径颗粒的测量较为准确。通过对不同粒径段灰颗粒的显微照相,发现细颗粒的团聚是筛分法测量小颗粒结果偏小的主要原因。

关 键 词:颗粒  粒径分布  筛分  激光粒度分析
文章编号:1008-5548(2007)05-0010-04
修稿时间:2006-11-15

Measurement Results Comparison Between Laser Particle Analyzer and Sieving Method in Particle Size Distribution
LI Wen-kai,WU Yu-xin,HUANG Zhi-min,FAN Rong,LV Jun-fu.Measurement Results Comparison Between Laser Particle Analyzer and Sieving Method in Particle Size Distribution[J].China Powder Science and Technology,2007,13(5):10-13.
Authors:LI Wen-kai  WU Yu-xin  HUANG Zhi-min  FAN Rong  LV Jun-fu
Affiliation:Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Abstract:In order to compare the difference between the Malvem laser analyzer and the sieving method in particle size distribution measurement, as many as 16 samples of CFB fly ash were measured by both methods respectively. The results from different methods showed a great diversity. The percentages ofultrafine particles obtained with laser analyzer are overestimated. This is considered to be due to the shape of particles. On the other side, the sieving method showed great errors in the measurements of small-sized particles, but more precise in the measurement of bigger particles. Micrography of particles with different size regio n w ere taken, which proved that the conglomeration of small particles was the main reason why results were smaller in the measurements of small-sized particles with the sieving method.
Keywords:particle  particle size distribution  sieving method  laser particle analysis
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号