多元主体视角下大城市边缘区空间治理结构、机制及路径研究

随着新型城镇化和乡村振兴战略的深入推进,大城市边缘区空间治理对于实现城乡均衡发展具有重要意义。多元主体协同共治是国家治理体系及治理能力提升的明确要求,论文基于多元主体视角,对大城市边缘区空间治理理论框架模型、结构、问题、机制以及路径进行了深入探究。随着大城市边缘区治理主体由单一主体向多元主体协同转型,城乡空间逐渐向均衡状态发展。在治理结构上,大城市边缘区空间治理结构逐渐由单中心结构向多中心网络结构转型。治理问题上,多元主体对大城市边缘区空间资源争夺造成物质空间混杂、社会空间分异以及空间权力不均衡3个方面问题。从机制角度分析,多元主体遵循各自的空间治理需求和逻辑对大城市边缘区实施相应的治理机制。基于多元主体协同,提出大城市边缘区空间治理优化路径。最后,总结大城市边缘区空间“治理结构—治理问题—治理机制—路径优化”递进式研究框架,以完善多元主体视角下大城市边缘区空间治理理论与实践分析研究。

Structure,mechanism,and paths of spatial governance in metropolitan fringe with the participation of multi-subjects

With the further development of new urbanization and implementation of the rural revitalization strategy, spatial governance in metropolitan fringe is worthy of attention. As the metropolitan fringe is located at the junction of urban and rural areas, population, society, resources, and other issues in metropolitan fringe reflect the urban-rural conflicts. Therefore, the spatial governance in metropolitan fringe is of great significance for the balanced development of urban and rural areas. As collaborative governance of multi-subjects is a clear requirement for the improvement of national governance system and governance capacity, it is important to examine how to realize the spatial governance of multi-subjects coordination in metropolitan fringe. Based on the perspective of multi-subjects, this study examined the theoretical framework, structure, issues, mechanisms, and paths of spatial governance in metropolitan fringe, and drew the following conclusions. First, through the literature and theoretical analysis of the relationship between the governance subjects and the spatial characteristics of metropolitan fringe, this article summarized the theoretical framework of spatial governance in metropolitan fringe from the perspective of multiple subjects. It showed that with the transformation of governance subject in metropolitan fringe from single subject to multi-subjects coordination, urban and rural spaces gradually develop to a balanced state. Second, by exploring the historical development of metropolitan fringe, this study concluded that the spatial governance structure of metropolitan fringe has gradually transformed from single center structure to multi-centric network structure. Third, in the process of spatial development in metropolitan fringe, the multi-subjects follow the principle of maximizing their own interests to compete for resources. The competition for spatial resources causes three problems of spatial governance, which are the diversification of material space, the differentiation of social space, and the imbalance of spatial power. Fourth, the multiple subjects follow their own spatial governance needs and logic to implement the corresponding governance mechanism for the urban fringe. Finally, based on the cooperation of multi-subjects, the optimized path of spatial governance in metropolitan fringe is concluded. Based on the above conclusions, this article summarized and constructed the progressive research framework of "governance structure-governance issues-governance mechanism-path optimization". At present, the research of spatial governance still needs to be improved. In order to promote the institutional turn of human geography and constantly expand the research field, it is vital to strengthen the research on the spatial relationship, governance mechanism, and path optimization of multi-subjects and metropolitan fringe.