帕罗西汀治疗慢性失眠症的临床对照研究

目的：探索帕罗西汀在慢性失眠症的治疗中是否有效，并比较帕罗西汀与艾司唑仑治疗慢性失眠症的临床效果。方法：74名慢性失眠患者，随机分成2组，分别接受帕罗西汀与艾司唑仑治疗。采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI）及睡眠日记评定疗效。结果：治疗第8天，艾司唑仑组患者睡眠状况显著改善，而帕罗西汀组则无明显变化：治疗第15天时．帕罗西汀组患者睡眠状况显著改善，睡眠各项指标与治疗前及艾司唑仑组相比，差异具有统计学意义，而艾司唑仑组患者的睡眠状况又恢复到治疗前的水平：治疗结束时及治疗结束后3个月，帕罗西汀组患者的睡眠状况依然好于治疗前及艾司唑仑组，差异具有统计学意义。结论：帕罗西汀可以有效治疗慢性失眠症，远期效果好于苯二氮Zhuo类药物艾司唑仑。

Comparison of Efficacy between Paroxetine and Estazolam on Chronic Insomnia

Objective: To determine whether paroxetine would be effective in the treatment of patients with chronic insomnia and to compare efficacy of paroxetine and estazolam on chronic insomnia. Methods: 74 patients with chronic insomnia were divided into 2 groups, receiving treatments of paroxetine and estazolam respectively. All of the subjects were assessed with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and sleep diary. Results: 1. On the eighth day of treatment, estazolam group showed improvement, all the indexes of sleep were better than those before treatment and those of paroxetine group; 2. On the fifteenth day of treatment, paroxetine group showed improvement, all the indexes of sleep were better than those before treatment and those of estazolam group, while the indexes of the estazolam group returned to pre-treatment level. 3. At the end of treatments and 3 months' follow up, paroxetine group still showed better effect in sleep indexes than estazolam group and the pre-treatment level. Conclusion: paroxetine is effective in the treatment of chronic insomnia and shows long-term effect.