| 两种糖化血红蛋白临床检验方法的一致性评价 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张小静,潘晓芳,邢立森,张润锋,李杨玲,吴静标.两种糖化血红蛋白临床检验方法的一致性评价[J].分子诊断与治疗杂志,2021(1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张小静 潘晓芳 邢立森 张润锋 李杨玲 吴静标 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广东省医疗器械质量监督检验所综合检验四室 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 心血管疾病床旁快速检测及信息化管理系统的开发与应用(201802010048)。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的使用线性回归方法和Bland-Altman分析法评估两种糖化血红蛋白检测系统检测结果的相关性和一致性。方法选取99例患者全血样本,分别使用糖化血红蛋白对照系统和考核系统检测,对两种检测系统的检测结果进行相关性分析与Bland-Altman分析。结果对照系统和考核系统间的决定系数R2=0.9779(P=0.0000),表明两种检测系统的测量结果之间具有显著的相关性。Bland-Altman一致性分析结果表明:界外点数(比率)4.04%。结论两种检测系统对糖化血红蛋白检测结果一致性良好。
|
| 关 键 词： | 糖化血红蛋白 HBALC Bland-Altman分析 |
Consistency Evaluation of Two Kinds of Clinical Examination Methods for Glycated Hemoglobin |
| |
| ZHANG Xiaojing,PAN Xiaofang,XING Lisen,ZHANG Runfeng,LI Yangling,WU Jingbiao.Consistency Evaluation of Two Kinds of Clinical Examination Methods for Glycated Hemoglobin[J].Journal of Molecular Diagnosis and Therapy,2021(1). |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Xiaojing PAN Xiaofang XING Lisen ZHANG Runfeng LI Yangling WU Jingbiao |
| |
| Affiliation: | (DivisionⅣof General Laboratory,Guangdong Medical Devices Quality Surveillance and Test Institude,Guangzhou,Guangdong,China,510663) |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective Consistency evaluation of two kinds of clinical examination for Glycated Hemoglobin(HbAlc)with linear correlation and Bland-Altman analysis.Methods Control system and assessment system were used to test the HbAlc of venous blood samples from 99 cases of patients,the results are analysed with correlation and Bland-Altman analysis.Results The determination coefficient R2 is 0.9779,which shows that there is a good relationgship between control system and assessment system;Bland-Altman consistency analysis shows that the maximum points out(ratio)is 4.04%.Conclusion There is a good consistency for HbAlc between control system and assessment system. |
| |
| Keywords: | Glycated Hemoglobin HbA1c Bland-Altman |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
