首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

分析国家自然科学基金审核反馈意见,推进基金精细化管理
引用本文:李艺影,陈静,石微微.分析国家自然科学基金审核反馈意见,推进基金精细化管理[J].实用医学杂志,2012,28(1):164-166.
作者姓名:李艺影  陈静  石微微
作者单位:首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院,北京市神经外科研究所,北京市,100050
摘    要:目的:分析国家自然科学基金审核中的反馈意见,探讨推进基金精细化管理的方法,提高获资助率。方法:通过回顾北京市神经外科研究所近5年(2006-2010年)64项国家自然科学基金审核过程中的反馈意见,分析基金管理缺陷,制定改善策略。结果:对审核反馈意见进行总结分析后发现47项基金未获资助的原因主要集中在:创新性不够、项目可行性差及立论依据不够充分、研究目标不明确,工作基础薄弱,人员、时间配置不合理等方面,完善管理政策后基金获资助率提高了36%。结论:分析国家自然科学基金审核反馈意见,制定相应的管理对策,推进基金精细化管理,完善基金申报工作,有助于提高基金获资助率。

关 键 词:国家自然科学基金  基金管理  资助率

Analyzing the review comments for NSFC to promote meticulous fund management
LI Yi-ying,CHEN Jing,SHI Wei-wei.Analyzing the review comments for NSFC to promote meticulous fund management[J].The Journal of Practical Medicine,2012,28(1):164-166.
Authors:LI Yi-ying  CHEN Jing  SHI Wei-wei
Affiliation:.Beijing Neurosurgical Institute,Beijing,100050,China
Abstract:Objective To analyze the review comments for natural science foundation of China(NSFC) and investigate the method for promoting meticulous fund management and raising the gain rate.Methods The review comments for 64 NSFC of Beijing neurosurgical institute from 2006 to 2010 were retrospectively analyzed,found management deficiencies were analyzed,and the corresponding measures were made.Results The main reasons for the failed gain of 47 NSFC support were:not enough novelty,without feasibility,insufficient basis for making a point,indefinite of objective,weak working foundation,unreasonable administration of staff and time.The gain rate of the institute was improved by 36% in the next year.Conclusion Analyzing the review comments for NSFC to promote meticulous fund management could improve the gain rate of NSFC support.
Keywords:Natural science foundation of China  Fund management  Gain rate
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号