中药灌肠和口服2种给药途径治疗慢性盆腔炎的文献评价

目的：系统评价慢性盆腔炎（CPID）中药灌肠与中药口服两种给药途径的疗效优势。方法：计算机检索Cochrane图书馆临床对照实验库、MEDLINE、EMBASE、中国学术期刊全文数据库（CNKI）、中国生物医学文献数据库（CBM）、万方数据库，检索相关学位论文及所获文献的参考文献，收集中药灌肠与中药口服治疗慢性盆腔炎的随机或半随机对照实验。结果：共纳入6个随机对照实验（RCT），共计498例CPID患者。大部分实验方法学质量较低且样本含量小。Meta分析结果显示中药灌肠组的总疗效优于中药口服组。结论：中药灌肠治疗慢性盆腔炎的疗效优于中药口服。

Systemic Review of Treatment for Chronic Pelvic Inflammatory Disease by TCM Enema and Oral Administration of TCM

Objective： To evaluate the advantages of treating chronic pelvic inflammatory disease （CPID） by TCM enema and oral administration systematically. Methods： All randomized or semi-randomized controlled trials of TCM enema and oral administration in treating CPID were collected from clinical controlled trials database of Cochrane library, MEDL1NE, EMBASE, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang database, the reference of related dissertations and the obtained literature with computer. Results： Altogether six RCTs were included and 498 patients involved. Most of the trials were of low quality and with small sampling. The results of Meta analysis showed that TCM enema group was superior to TCM oral administration group in total effects. Conclusion： Clinical effects of TCM enema are superior to these of oral TCM in treating CPID.