首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     


Spatial cost–benefit analysis of blue restoration and factors driving net benefits globally
Authors:Phoebe J Stewart-Sinclair  Carissa J Klein  Ian J Bateman  Catherine E Lovelock
Affiliation:1. School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia;2. Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia;3. Land, Environment, Economics and Policy Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
Abstract:Marine coastal ecosystems, commonly referred to as blue ecosystems, provide valuable services to society but are under increasing threat worldwide due to a variety of drivers, including eutrophication, development, land-use change, land reclamation, and climate change. Ecological restoration is sometimes necessary to facilitate recovery in coastal ecosystems. Blue restoration (i.e., in marine coastal systems) is a developing field, and projects to date have been small scale and expensive, leading to the perception that restoration may not be economically viable. We conducted a global cost–benefit analysis to determine the net benefits of restoring coral reef, mangrove, saltmarsh, and seagrass ecosystems, where the benefit is defined as the monetary value of ecosystem services. We estimated costs from published restoration case studies and used an adjusted-value-transfer method to assign benefit values to these case studies. Benefit values were estimated as the monetary value provided by ecosystem services of the restored habitats. Benefits outweighed costs (i.e., there were positive net benefits) for restoration of all blue ecosystems. Mean benefit:cost ratios for ecosystem restoration were eight to 10 times higher than prior studies of coral reef and seagrass restoration, most likely due to the more recent lower cost estimates we used. Among ecosystems, saltmarsh had the greatest net benefits followed by mangrove; coral reef and seagrass ecosystems had lower net benefits. In general, restoration in nations with middle incomes had higher (eight times higher in coral reefs and 40 times higher in mangroves) net benefits than those with high incomes. Within an ecosystem type, net benefit varied with restoration technique (coral reef and saltmarsh), ecosystem service produced (mangrove and saltmarsh), and project duration (seagrass). These results challenge the perceptions of the low economic viability of blue restoration and should encourage further targeted investment in this field.
Keywords:coral reef  ecosystem services  mangrove  marine coastal restoration  natural capital  restoration cost  saltmarsh  seagrass  arrecife de coral  capital natural  costo de restauración  manglar  marisma  pastos marinos  restauración de costas marinas  servicios ambientales
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号