首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

新旧“测试规程”压实度试验方法对比研究
引用本文:黎春燕,李彬.新旧“测试规程”压实度试验方法对比研究[J].工程质量,2021(1):27-29.
作者姓名:黎春燕  李彬
作者单位:;1.云南省公路科学技术研究院;2.昆明市建设工程质量检测中心
摘    要:为保证路基施工质量,必须对压实度进行检测。本文对JTG 3450-2019和JTG E60-2008新旧两个版本《公路路基路面现场测试规程》中常用的测试压实度试验方法挖坑灌砂法和沉降差法进行对比分析,提出新规程中的亮点和有待进一步研究完善的地方,有助于更好地指导现场压实度检测。

关 键 词:路基  压实度  灌砂法  沉降差法  试验检测

A Comparative Study on the Test Method of Compaction Degree in the New and Old Roadbed Pavement Field Test Procedures
LI Chunyan,LI Bin.A Comparative Study on the Test Method of Compaction Degree in the New and Old Roadbed Pavement Field Test Procedures[J].Quality of Civil Engineering and Construction,2021(1):27-29.
Authors:LI Chunyan  LI Bin
Affiliation:(Yunnan Institute of Highway Science and Technology,Kunming Yunnan 650051,China;Kunming Construction Engineering Quality Testing Center,Kunming Yunnan 650000,China)
Abstract:In order to ensure the construction quality of roadbed,the compaction degree must be tested.This paper makes a comparative analysis of the test methods of compaction degree commonly used in the old and new“Field Test Methods of Subgrade and Pavement for Highway Engineering”of JTG E60-2008 and JTG 3450-2019,including the method of digging and filling sand and the method of settlement difference,and puts forward the highlights of the new procedures and the areas to be further studied and improved,which is helpful to better guide the field compaction degree test.
Keywords:roadbed  compaction  sand filling method  settlement difference method  test detection
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号