首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

兵器零部件微裂纹检测方法的对比分析
引用本文:车俊铁,侯强,于静.兵器零部件微裂纹检测方法的对比分析[J].兵器材料科学与工程,2005,28(5):44-47.
作者姓名:车俊铁  侯强  于静
作者单位:北京石油化工学院,北京,102617
基金项目:国防科技重点实验室.51489020204ZD0201
摘    要:针对武器装备零部件在役时出现微损伤的特点,就超声波、涡流、金属磁记忆三种无损检测方法加以对比分析如何检测微裂纹以及各自的优缺点。通过分析,得出检测大型部件表面和近表面缺陷时,选用涡流或超声波检测方法,检测埋深较大的内部微裂纹时,应用超声波进行定位定量检测;对于异型、高温零部件最好选用涡流非接触检测;检修武器装备时,先用磁记忆技术诊断,在发现有微裂纹微拟伤部位再用超声波进行量检测分析,超声波无法检测的情况下,可用射线检测。

关 键 词:超声波  涡流  磁记忆  定性分忻  定量分析
文章编号:1004-244X(2005)05-0044-04
收稿时间:2004-12-17
修稿时间:2005-07-18

Contrast analysis of testing methods for tiny crack in parts of weapon
CHE Jun-tie,HOU Qiang,YU Jing.Contrast analysis of testing methods for tiny crack in parts of weapon[J].Ordnance Material Science and Engineering,2005,28(5):44-47.
Authors:CHE Jun-tie  HOU Qiang  YU Jing
Abstract:For the character of crack in parts of weapon, this article introduces the methods of UT,ET and MT to test the crack, and contrasts their advantages and disadvantages. By analysis, ET or UT is suitable for testing surface and near surface crack of large parts, and UT is suitable for internal tiny crack. For the different type and high temperature parts, ET should be chosen. For the weapon parts, MT should firstly be use, and then UT and RT are used to test and analyse the crack.
Keywords:ultrasonic  eddy current  magnetic memory  qualitative analysis  quantitative analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号