| Abstract: | A thermoplastic vulcanizate (TPV) of a ethylene–propylene–diene terpolymer (EPDM) and nylon copolymer (PA) was prepared by dynamic vulcanization. Maleic anhydride (MAH)–grafted EPDM (EPDM–g–MAH), MAH‐grafted EPR (EPR–g–MAH), and chlorinated polyethylene (CPE) were used as compatibilizers. The effect of dynamic vulcanization and compatibilizer on the crystallization behavior of PA was investigated. Differential scanning calorimeter measurement results showed no pronounced shift in the crystallization temperature for PA in EPDM–PA TPV compared to that for PA in the neat state, whereas the crystallization temperature increased after adding compatibilizer. The decrease in the crystallinity of TPVs was a result of the crystallization occurring in confined spaces between rubber particles. The equilibrium melting temperature (Tm0) of the PA copolymer was measured and was determined to be 157°C. The isothermal crystallization kinetics of PA in the neat and TPV states also was investigated. The crystallization rate was highest in the compatibilized TPV and lowest in the neat PA, whereas it was intermediate in the uncompatibilized TPV unvulcanized blends. Compared with unvulcanized EPDM–PA blends, the dynamic vulcanization process seemed to cause an obvious increase in the crystallization rate of the PA copolymer, especially when a suitable compatibilizer was used. This occurred because the dynamic vulcanization introduced fine crosslinked rubber particles that could act as heterogeneous nucleating centers. In addition, the use of a suitable compatibilizer permitted the formation of finely dispersed vulcanized rubber particles and therefore increased the density of the nucleating centers. The complex morphology of the blends was investigated by atomic force microscopy to evaluate the effect of compatibilizer on the size of the dispersed rubber particles. Compared with the morphology of TPVs with the same dosage of EPDM–g–MAH compatibilizer, the morphology of TPVs using EPR–g–MAH as compatibilizer showed much smaller dispersed rubber particles, which may have contributed to the higher crystallization rate. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 824–829, 2003 |
