首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

对《中华人民共和国药典》2010年版(一部)的分析和探讨
引用本文:蔡小兵,胡欣,金鹏飞.对《中华人民共和国药典》2010年版(一部)的分析和探讨[J].中国新药杂志,2012(16):1874-1877.
作者姓名:蔡小兵  胡欣  金鹏飞
作者单位:总参谋部警卫局卫生保健处;卫生部北京医院药学部
基金项目:国家“重大新药创制”科技重大专项(2008ZX09312-005);中央保健科研课题专项资金(B2009B032)
摘    要:通过对《中华人民共和国药典》2010年版(一部)的仔细研读,并结合自身的实际工作和专业知识,对新版药典的改进和不足进行了分析和探讨,为《中华人民共和国药典》的修订和完善提供参考。新版药典大幅增加了收载品种、增加了安全性检验的方法、加强了检验新技术的应用并且更加注重药品质量的总体控制,但也存在着含量测定的比例仍然偏低、含量测定成分的选择不够科学、含量测定和鉴别重复、药材和其对应饮片的含量测定标准不一致、农药残留及重金属和有害元素限量检查有待改进等问题。

关 键 词:中华人民共和国药典  改进  不足

Analysis and discussion on 2010 edition(volume I) of Chinese Pharmacopoeia
CAI Xiao-bing,HU Xin,JIN Peng-fei.Analysis and discussion on 2010 edition(volume I) of Chinese Pharmacopoeia[J].Chinese Journal of New Drugs,2012(16):1874-1877.
Authors:CAI Xiao-bing  HU Xin  JIN Peng-fei
Affiliation:1 Health Care Division,Security Bureau of the General Staff,Beijing 100017,China; 2 Department of Pharmaceutical Science,Beijing Hospital,Beijing 100730,China)
Abstract:To provide references for the revise and upgrade in Chinese Pharmacopoeia,this paper analyzed and discussed the improvements and deficient of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia(2010 edition,volume I) based on a careful study as well as the authors’ expertise and performance experiences.The Pharmacopoeia included more medicinal herbs and preparations,involved more safety analysis methods,used more new analysis technologies and pay more attentions on polynary quality controls.However,there were also some deficiencies such as the low percentage of content determination,the irrationality of determined compounds,the repetition between identification and content determination,the difference content requirements between the crude herbs and their prepared drug in pieces,the imperfect on the analysis of pesticide residues,heavy metals and harmful elements.
Keywords:Chinese Pharmacopoeia  improvement  deficient
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号