首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同干扰类型对呼伦贝尔草甸草原群落结构及物种多样性影响的比较
引用本文:高军靖,吕世海,刘及东,郑志荣,叶生星.不同干扰类型对呼伦贝尔草甸草原群落结构及物种多样性影响的比较[J].环境科学研究,2013,26(7):765-771.
作者姓名:高军靖  吕世海  刘及东  郑志荣  叶生星
作者单位:1.中国环境科学研究院, 国家环境保护区域生态过程与功能评估重点实验室, 环境基准与风险评估国家重点实验室, 北京 100012
基金项目:国家环境保护公益性行业科研专项,国家"十二五"科技支撑计划项目,中国环境科学研究院改革启动专项
摘    要:采用样方法,对比研究了2009—2011年刈割和围封干扰对呼伦贝尔草甸草原植物群落结构和物种多样性的影响. 结果表明:2009—2011年,围封干扰下建群种种群相对重要值分别为15.67%、17.73%、17.60%;而刈割干扰下建群种种群相对重要值分别为16.86%、14.84%、12.36%,呈明显下降趋势;表明围封干扰可促进建群种种群生长,而刈割则有一定的抑制作用. 2种干扰类型导致的植物群落生态类型变化趋势差异尚不显著. 2009—2011年,刈割干扰下,Margalef物种丰富度指数分别为6.05、4.58、4.27,Shannon-Wiener多样性指数分别为3.13、2.89、2.79,Pielou均匀度指数分别为0.90、0.91、0.90;围封干扰下,Margalef物种丰富度指数分别为6.46、6.03、5.32,Shannon-Wiener多样性指数分别为3.26、3.18、2.98,Pielou均匀度指数分别为0.87、0.87、0.85. 可见,在相同年份,刈割干扰下Margalef物种丰富度指数和Shannon-Wiener多样性指数均低于围封干扰,Pielou均匀度指数均高于围封干扰. 说明围封干扰有利于植物物种多样性的维持,而适度的刈割干扰则有利于植物群落的均一化. 

关 键 词:刈割    围封    群落结构    物种多样性    呼伦贝尔草甸草原
收稿时间:2013/1/11 0:00:00
修稿时间:2013/5/15 0:00:00

Comparative Study on Effects of Different Disturbances on Community Structure and Species Diversity in Hulunbuir Meadow Steppe
GAO Jun-jing,Lü Shi-hai,LIU Ji-dong,ZHENG Zhi-rong,YE Sheng-xing.Comparative Study on Effects of Different Disturbances on Community Structure and Species Diversity in Hulunbuir Meadow Steppe[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2013,26(7):765-771.
Authors:GAO Jun-jing  Lü Shi-hai  LIU Ji-dong  ZHENG Zhi-rong  YE Sheng-xing
Affiliation:1.State Environment Protection Key Laboratory of Regional Eco-process and Function Assessment, State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China2.College of Life Sciences, Hulunbuir College, Hailar 021008, China
Abstract:Effects of two disturbances (mowing and enclosure) on community structure and plant species diversity in Hulunbuir meadow steppe were studied by the controlled experiments and quadrat method. Results showed that relative importance of constructive species increased from 15.67% to 17.60% for enclosing treatment, while it decreased from 16.86% to 12.36% for mowing treatment. This indicated that enclosure promoted the growth of constructive species and mowing prohibited the growth in 3years. There was no significant difference between variation trends of plant ecotypes under the two disturbances. During the period of 2009-2011, enclosure treatment (Margalef index:6.46,6.03and 5.32; Shannon-Wiener index:3.26,3.18and 2.98; Pielou index:0.87,0.87and 0.85) showed a higher species diversity and lower evenness than that under the mowing treatment (Margalef index:6.05,4.58and 4.27; Shannon-Wiener index:3.13,2.89and 2.79; Pielou index:0.90,0.91and 0.90). This suggested that enclosure preserves species diversity and mowing could be helpful for homogenization of vegetation community.
Keywords:mowing  enclosure  community structure  species diversity  Hulunbuir meadow steppe
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号