| Abstract: | Three experiments investigated children's and adults' understanding of the uncertainty inherent in emotionally equivocal situations (i.e., situations that commonly elicit different feelings in different people). Students in 1st grade, 3rd grade, 6th grade, and college heard scenarios in which a peer experienced an emotionally equivocal or unequivocal event. Children, and to some degree adults, were overconfident about how individuals felt in equivocal situations. The tendency to acknowledge only 1 emotional possibility appeared to reflect difficulty in recognizing the plausibility of alternatives. Neither prompting children to give greater consideration to alternatives nor reminding them of the existence of individual differences produced greater discrimination between equivocal and unequivocal situations. In contrast, children recognized uncertainty when there was variability in the situation or within the individual. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
