首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

血浆巨细胞病毒多聚酶链反应检测用于指导干预性治疗
引用本文:许兰平,黄晓军,郭乃榄,任汉云,张耀臣,陆道培.血浆巨细胞病毒多聚酶链反应检测用于指导干预性治疗[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2003,35(2):132-135.
作者姓名:许兰平  黄晓军  郭乃榄  任汉云  张耀臣  陆道培
作者单位:北京大学人民医院血液病研究所,北京,100044
摘    要:目的:分析用血浆巨细胞病毒(cytomegalovirus,CMV)多聚酶链反应(plymerase chain reaction,PCR)检测结果指导抗CMV干预性治疗的临床意义。方法:1999年8月至2001年7月行异基因造血干细胞移植(hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,HSCT)的所有患者自预处理开始,常规用PCR法检测血浆的CMV-DNA(采用华美公司生产的巨细胞病毒4℃ PCR检测试剂盒),每周1次。其中尚无CMV病的临床表现而检测到血浆CMV阳性的患者89例。随机选取52例阳性患者给予干预性治疗。将上述89例患者分为3组(分别为停止治疗时血浆CMV-PCR转阴组、停止治疗时未转阴组、血浆CMV阳性未治疗组)比较各组CMV病的发生率。CMV病的发生率采用Kaplan-Meier曲线表示,曲线间的比较用Log-Rank(曲线无交叉)或Breslow(曲线交叉)检验,某时点率的比较采用RXC列联表或χ^2检验。结果:100d内CMV病的发生率,在治疗后血浆CMV-PCR由阳性转为阴性组为10.26%,治疗结束时血浆CMV-PCR仍为阳性组为66.67%,血浆CMV-PCR阳性未治疗组为36.24%(P=0.0000)。上述3组中任两组移植后100d CMV病的发生率差异均有显著性。移植后1年时上述3例CMV病累积发生率分别为30.65%、75.00%、42.95%(P=0.0009),治疗未转阴组与治疗转阴组和阳性未治疗组相比,CMV病的发生率明显升高。结论:血浆CMV-PCR检测结果用来指导干预性治疗有一定临床意义。干预性治疗后血浆CMV-DNA仍未转阴者,应考虑换药或联合用药治疗。

关 键 词:造血干细胞移植/并发症  聚合酶链反应  巨细胞病毒感染/预防和控制
文章编号:1671-167X(2003)02-0132-04

Pre-emptive antiviral therapy guided by extended routine plasma polymerase chain reaction surveillance
Lanping Xu,Xiaojun Huang,Nailan Guo,Hanyun Ren,Yaochen Zhang,Daopei Lu.Pre-emptive antiviral therapy guided by extended routine plasma polymerase chain reaction surveillance[J].Journal of Peking University:Health Sciences,2003,35(2):132-135.
Authors:Lanping Xu  Xiaojun Huang  Nailan Guo  Hanyun Ren  Yaochen Zhang  Daopei Lu
Affiliation:Institute of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China. lpxu_0415@sina.com
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of plasma CMV-PCR to guide anti-CMV pre-emptive therapy. METHODS: We analyzed 89 Allogeneic hematologic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) patients with plasma CMV-DNA positive after HSCT. From the day of HSCT, plasma CMV-DNA were monitored weekly(CMV 4 degrees C PCR kits), and 52 cases were chosen randomisely to receive pre-emptive therapy. The 89 patients were divided into three groups: patients without pre-emptive therapy, patients with plasma CMV-DNA remaining positive after pre-emptive therapy, and patients with plasma CMV-DNA turning to negative after pre-emptive therapy. Kaplan-Meier curve differences were compared by Log-Rank or Breslow test, RXC tables or chi 2 tests were used to compare the incidence of CMV disease. RESULTS: The accumulative incidence of CMV disease within the first 100 days after HSCT was 36.24% among the PV-PCR (CMV-PCR) positive patients without pre-emptive therapy, 66.67% among the patients with PV-PCR remaining positive after pre-emptive therapy, and 10.26% among the patients with PV-PCR turning to be negative after pre-emptive therapy respectively (P = 0.0000). The incidence of CMV disease 100 days post HSCT between any two groups was different. The accumulative incidence of CMV disease 1 year after HSCT was 42.95%, 75.00% and 30.65%, respectively among the above three groups (P = 0.0009). The incidence of CMV disease in 1 year among patients with PV-PCR remaining positive after pre-emptive treatment was higher than the others. CONCLUSION: PV-PCR guided pre-emptive therapy may decrease the incidence of CMV disease within 100 days after HSCT, and patients with PV-PCR remaining positive after pre-emptive therapy may need a combined treatment.
Keywords:Hematopoietic stem cell  transplantation/compl  Cytomegalovirus infection/prev  Polymerase chain reaction
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号