| Abstract: | Audiometric bone conduction test data are obtained with a unit that permits comparison with a recognized standard because the unit can be calibrated to operate within specified limits. Proper calibration of the unit is necessary if the equipment is to be accurate. Two procedures can be helpful in determining the need for calibration: the average loss method and the input voltage measurement method. Neither should supplant calibration, but each offers a means of checking the output of the unit. Confidence in auditory test data is increased when there is a high degree of consistency among the various tests; the availability of several different tests in the audiometric series can be used to an advantage then in a determination of consistency. An additional opportunity to ascertain the existence of consistency is present when tuning fork tests are employed as part of the total evaluation. The use of a masking stimulus in the nontest ear simultaneously with the presentation of the test tone to the test ear can be extremely useful in defining the type as well as the extent of the hearing loss. Presentation of the test tone and the masking stimulus in controlled discrete steps is the key to the interpretation of masking results. |
